Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Divergent taste responsiveness to fruit of the tree Antidesma bunius

Abstract

GENETIC divergence of taste responsiveness was first demonstrated for phenylthiocarbamide (PTC)1, the inability to taste PTC bitter being described as an inherited Mendelian recessive character, and ability to taste PTC bitter as dominant2. This hypothesis has largely been confirmed3,4 although occasional incomplete penetrance of the ‘taster’ gene has been reported. Recently, eight people were served with a pie made from antidesma berries, and two people complained that the pie was extremely bitter and inedible. The other six people, however, found the pie pleasant tasting, enjoyably edible and sweet. This incident prompted us to survey taste responsivness to antidesma. We found that all subjects who tasted antidesma as bitter found PTC not bitter, whereas no subject who tasted PTC as bitter found antidesma bitter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Fox, A. L., Sci. News Lett., 19, 249 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blakeslee, A. F., Proc. natn Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 21, 120–130 (1932).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Das, S. R., Ann. hum. Genet., 22, 200 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beandtzaeg Merton, B., Acta Genet., 8, 114 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giroux, E. L., and Henkin, R. I., Life Sci., 10, 361–370 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. PseudoIsochromatic Plates (Beck, Philadelphia, 1965).

  7. Hartmann, G., Ann. Eugen., 9, 123–135 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, H., and Kalmus, H., Ann. hum. Genetics, 10, 24–31 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoyme, E. J., Heredity, 46, 167–176 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairchild, D., Garden Islands of the Great East, 239 (Scribner, New York, 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burkill, I. H., Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peminsula (Crown Agents for the Colonies, London, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer, R., and Griffin, F., Drug Res., 14, 673–686 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Valenstein, E. S., Kokalewski, J. W., and Cox, V. C., Science, 146, 942–943 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, M. J., Bartoshuk, L. M., Cain, W. S., and Stevens, J. C., Nature, 253, 442–443 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HENKIN, R., GILLIS, W. Divergent taste responsiveness to fruit of the tree Antidesma bunius. Nature 265, 536–537 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265536a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265536a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing