Abstract
THE neotropical coral-snake complex with its contrasting ringed patterns includes true coral snakes, for example, the highly venomous elapid genus Micrurus, and many colubrids that are either less strongly venomous or non-venomous1. Whether or not this complex involves Batesian and/or Müllerian mimicry has been widely debated2–5. Wickler1 suggested that if mimicry depends on predator learning, true coral snakes are too deadly to be models; rather, they are mimics of the less dangerous colubrids of the complex (Mertensian mimicry). He also claimed that there was no evidence that any predator could recognise a coral snake innately1. I have shown that Costa Rican turquoise-browed motmots (Emomota superciliosa) need no learning to show strong aversion to a pattern of wide yellow and narrow red rings6; this I have interpreted as an innate recognition of a generalised coral-snake pattern. No Costa Rican member of the coral-snake complex has wider yellow than red rings, however, so I had no proof that the motmots were not simply showing an aversion to a general aposematic pattern. I present here evidence that another avian predator needs no learning to avoid not only a pattern of wide yellow and red rings, but also the most common local Micrurus pattern of red, yellow and black rings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wickler, W., Mimicry in Plants and Animals (World University Library, London. 1968).
Dunn, E. R., Evolution, 8, 97–102 (1954).
Brattstrom, B. H., Evolution, 9, 217–219 (1955).
Greene, H. W., and Pyburn, W. R., Biologist, 55, 144–148 (1973).
Hecht, M. K., and Marien, D. J. Morph., 98, 335–366 (1956).
Smith, S. M., Science, 187, 759–760 (1975).
Taylor, E. H., Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull., 34, 1–188 (1951).
Slud, P., Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist., 128, 1–430 (1964).
Coppinger, R. P., Am. Nat., 104, 323–335 (1970).
Rettenmeyer, C. W., A. Rev. Ent., 15, 43–74 (1970).
Brower, L. P., Brower, J. V. Z., and Collins, C. T., Zoologica, N. Y., 48, 65–84 (1963).
Brower, L. P., Alcock, J., and Brower, J. V. Z., in Ecological Genetics and Evolution (edit. by Creed, R.), 261–274 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1971).
Otte, D., A. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 5, 385–417 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SMITH, S. Coral-snake pattern recognition and stimulus generalisation by naive great kiskadees (Aves: Tyrannidae). Nature 265, 535–536 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265535a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265535a0
This article is cited by
-
In paired preference tests, domestic chicks innately choose the colour green over red, and the shape of a frog over a sphere when both stimuli are green
Animal Cognition (2023)
-
Effects of predator associative learning and innate aversion on mimicry complexes
Evolutionary Ecology (2023)
-
Predator-based selection and the impact of edge sympatry on components of coral snake mimicry
Evolutionary Ecology (2022)
-
Colours as aggregation signals in Lepidoptera: Are Heliconius Müllerian mimics?
Evolutionary Ecology (2022)
-
Relationship between model noxiousness and mimetic accuracy in myrmecomorphic spiders
Evolutionary Ecology (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.