Altered cyclic AMP-binding and db cyclic AMP-unresponsiveness in vivo

Abstract

CYCLIC AMP has been implicated in the regulation of cell growth. However, the molecular mechanism of cyclic AMP action, especially that involving the control of tumour growth in vivo is not clear. Our previous studies on two cell populations of Walker 256 mammary carcinoma (W256), one regressing (responsive), the other growing (unresponsive) under dibutyryl (db) cyclic AMP treatment, showed a correlation between altered cyclic AMP-binding of the tumour cytosol and db cyclic AMP-unresponsiveness1. Deficient cyclic AMP-binding in other malignant growth has also been reported2–4. It is suggested that the defective cyclic AMP-binding proteins may be the possible cause for the loss of growth control by cyclic AMP. To determine the relationship between the qualitative difference of cyclic AMP-binding proteins and db cyclic AMP-responsiveness in vivo, we have used various experimental tumour models, such as, transplantable mammary carcinoma (MTW9) in Wistar-Furth inbred female rats, a hormone-dependent tumour; primary, N-nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary carcinoma (NMU) and transplantable mammary adenocarcinoma (R3230AC) in Fischer female rats, hormone-responsive tumours; and hepatoma 5123 in Buffalo/N female rats.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Cho-Chung, Y. S., and Clair, T., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 64, 768–772 (1975).

  2. 2

    Granner, K. K., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 46, 1516–1522 (1972).

  3. 3

    Criss, W. E., and Morris, H. P., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 54, 380–386 (1973).

  4. 4

    Goldberg, M. L., Burke, G. C., and Morris, H. P., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 62, 320–327 (1975).

  5. 5

    Cho-Chung, Y. S., and Gullino, P. M., Science, 183, 87–88 (1974).

  6. 6

    Gilman, A. G., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 67, 305–312 (1970).

  7. 7

    Do Khac, L., Harbon, S., and Clausen, H. J., Eur. J. Biochem., 40, 177–185 (1973).

  8. 8

    Rousseau, G. G., Baxter, J. D., and Tomkins, G. M., J. molec. Biol., 67, 99–115 (1972).

  9. 9

    Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. biol. Chem., 193, 265–275 (1951).

  10. 10

    Simantov, R., and Sachs, L., J. biol. Chem. 250, 3236–3242 (1975).

  11. 11

    Scatchard, G., Ann. N. Y. Acad., Sci., 51, 660–672 (1949).

  12. 12

    Cho-Chung, Y. S., and Gullino, P. M., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 52, 995–996 (1974).

  13. 13

    Walsh, D. A., Perkins, J. P., and Krebs, E. G., J. biol. Chem., 243, 3763–3765 (1968).

  14. 14

    Kuo, J. F., and Greengard, P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 64, 1349–1355 (1969).

  15. 15

    Gill, G. N., and Garren, L. D., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 39, 335–343 (1970).

  16. 16

    Tao. M., Salas, M. L., and Lipmann, F., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 67, 408–414 (1970).

  17. 17

    Kumon, A., Yamamura, H., and Nishizuka, Y., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 41, 1290–1297 (1970).

  18. 18

    Reimann, E. M., Brostrom, C. O., Corbin, J. D., King, C. A., and Krebs, E. G., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 42, 187–194 (1971).

  19. 19

    Erlichman J., Hirsch, A. H., and Rosen, O. M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 731–735 (1971).

  20. 20

    Martin, R. G., and Ames, B. N., J. biol. Chem., 236, 1372–1379 (1961).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CHO-CHUNG, Y., CLAIR, T. Altered cyclic AMP-binding and db cyclic AMP-unresponsiveness in vivo. Nature 265, 452–454 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265452a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.