Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Altered cyclic AMP-binding and db cyclic AMP-unresponsiveness in vivo

Abstract

CYCLIC AMP has been implicated in the regulation of cell growth. However, the molecular mechanism of cyclic AMP action, especially that involving the control of tumour growth in vivo is not clear. Our previous studies on two cell populations of Walker 256 mammary carcinoma (W256), one regressing (responsive), the other growing (unresponsive) under dibutyryl (db) cyclic AMP treatment, showed a correlation between altered cyclic AMP-binding of the tumour cytosol and db cyclic AMP-unresponsiveness1. Deficient cyclic AMP-binding in other malignant growth has also been reported2–4. It is suggested that the defective cyclic AMP-binding proteins may be the possible cause for the loss of growth control by cyclic AMP. To determine the relationship between the qualitative difference of cyclic AMP-binding proteins and db cyclic AMP-responsiveness in vivo, we have used various experimental tumour models, such as, transplantable mammary carcinoma (MTW9) in Wistar-Furth inbred female rats, a hormone-dependent tumour; primary, N-nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary carcinoma (NMU) and transplantable mammary adenocarcinoma (R3230AC) in Fischer female rats, hormone-responsive tumours; and hepatoma 5123 in Buffalo/N female rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho-Chung, Y. S., and Clair, T., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 64, 768–772 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Granner, K. K., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 46, 1516–1522 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Criss, W. E., and Morris, H. P., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 54, 380–386 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg, M. L., Burke, G. C., and Morris, H. P., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 62, 320–327 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho-Chung, Y. S., and Gullino, P. M., Science, 183, 87–88 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilman, A. G., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 67, 305–312 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Do Khac, L., Harbon, S., and Clausen, H. J., Eur. J. Biochem., 40, 177–185 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rousseau, G. G., Baxter, J. D., and Tomkins, G. M., J. molec. Biol., 67, 99–115 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. biol. Chem., 193, 265–275 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Simantov, R., and Sachs, L., J. biol. Chem. 250, 3236–3242 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scatchard, G., Ann. N. Y. Acad., Sci., 51, 660–672 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho-Chung, Y. S., and Gullino, P. M., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 52, 995–996 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh, D. A., Perkins, J. P., and Krebs, E. G., J. biol. Chem., 243, 3763–3765 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo, J. F., and Greengard, P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 64, 1349–1355 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gill, G. N., and Garren, L. D., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 39, 335–343 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao. M., Salas, M. L., and Lipmann, F., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 67, 408–414 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumon, A., Yamamura, H., and Nishizuka, Y., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 41, 1290–1297 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reimann, E. M., Brostrom, C. O., Corbin, J. D., King, C. A., and Krebs, E. G., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 42, 187–194 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Erlichman J., Hirsch, A. H., and Rosen, O. M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 731–735 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, R. G., and Ames, B. N., J. biol. Chem., 236, 1372–1379 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CHO-CHUNG, Y., CLAIR, T. Altered cyclic AMP-binding and db cyclic AMP-unresponsiveness in vivo. Nature 265, 452–454 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265452a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265452a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing