Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Rates, sample sizes, and the neutrality hypothesis for electrophoresis in evolutionary studies

Abstract

It is shown that electrophoretic genetic distance estimates are highly correlated with albumin immunological distances between the same pairs of species. The bimodality of rates of electrophoretic differentiation at various loci is then documented and the electrophoretic clocks involved are calibrated. The differences between the systematics and population genetics uses of electrophoretic data are then discussed. Finally, a direct electrophoretic test of the neutral alleles hypothesis is presented and exemplified on a set of Thomomys bottae-umbrinus data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nei, M., Am. Nat., 105, 385–398 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nei, M., Am. Nat., 106, 283–292 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarich, V. M., Syst. Zool., 18, 286–295 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Champion, A. B., Soderberg, K. L., Wilson, A. C., and Ambler, R. P., J. molec. Evol., 5, 291–305 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, W. E., and Selander, R. K., Syst. Zool., 20, 377–405 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, W. E., Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., and Kim, Y. J., Univ. Texas Publ., 7213, 297–305 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, M. H., Selander, R. K., and Johnson, W. E., J. Mamm., 54, 1–13 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Case, S. M., Haneline, P. G., and Smith, M. F., Syst. Zool., 24, 281–295 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, S. Y., Soule, M., and Gorman, G. C., Syst. Zool., 23, 387–399 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickerson, R. E., J. molec. Evol., 1, 26–45 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Langley, C. H., and Fitch, W. M., J. molec. Evol., 3, 161–178 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maxson, L. R., Sarich, V. M., and Wilson, A. C., Nature, 255, 397–400 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruth, R. C., and Wold, F., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 54 B, 1–6 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. King, M.-C., thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley (1974).

  15. King, M.-C., and Wilson, A. C., Science, 188, 107–118 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarich, V. M., Nature, 245, 218–220 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cronin, J. E., and Sarich, V. M., J. Hum. Evol., 4, 357–375 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gillespie, J. H., and Kojima, K., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 61, 582–585 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kojima, K., Gillespie, J. H., and Tobari, Y. N., Biochem. Genet., 4, 627–63 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, G. B., Science, 184, 28–37 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, J. K., and Zimmerman, E. G., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 53 B, 319–324 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nevo, E., Kim, Y. J., Shaw, C. R., and Thaeler, C. S., Jr, Evol., 28, 1–23 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmerman, E. G., Hart, B. J., and Kilpatrick, C. W., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 52 B, 541–545 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Patton, J. L., MacArthur, H., and Yang, S. Y., J. Mammal., 57, 159–163 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cronin, J. E., and Sarich, V. M., Nature, 260, 700–702 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarich, V. Rates, sample sizes, and the neutrality hypothesis for electrophoresis in evolutionary studies. Nature 265, 24–28 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265024a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265024a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing