Abstract
IN February 1975, the Chinese Seismological Bureau successfully predicted a magnitude 7.3 earthquake near Haicheng, Liaoning Province. From their reports, it is obvious that many methods such as radon count, abnormal animal behaviour, seismic velocity, and tilt and telluric current anomalies were considered in making the long term prediction1. The short term prediction, however, was based primarily on foreshock activity2,3. That foreshocks were important in the prediction raises the question of how common they are. We here analyse the frequency of foreshocks before shallow earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 7. Our findings show that 44% of all large shallow events in the world from 1950 to 1973 had fore-shocks large enough to be teleseismidally recorded, and that 21% of the large earthquakes that occurred in China between 1900 and 1949 had foreshocks large enough to be noted in local records.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Preseismic atmospheric radon anomaly associated with 2018 Northern Osaka earthquake
Scientific Reports Open Access 02 April 2021
-
Seismic rate variations prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 giant megathrust earthquake
Scientific Reports Open Access 01 February 2021
-
Seismic and Aseismic Preparatory Processes Before Large Stick–Slip Failure
Pure and Applied Geophysics Open Access 26 October 2020
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
References
Anon ., Paper distributed at Intergovernmental Conference on Mitigation of Earthquake Risk, UNESCO, Paris, February 10–19 (1976).
Li, Teh-run, Earthq. Frontiers, 2, 8–9 (1975).
Adams, R. D., Bull. N.Z. natn. Soc. Earthq. Engng (in the press).
Zhong Guo Di Zhen Mu Lu, Chronological Tables of Earthquake Data of China, 1653 (Academica Sinica, Pekin, 1970).
Duda, S., Tectonophysics, 2, 409 (1965).
United States Earthquakes, 1965–1973 (US Govt Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1967–1975).
Evernden, J. F., Bull. Am. seism. Soc., 60, 393 (1970).
Evernden, J. F., Bull. Am. seism. Soc., 61, 241 (1971).
Immamura, A., Theoretical and Applied Seismology, 55–57 (Maruzan, Tokyo, 1937).
Richter, C. F., Elementary Sesimology (Frerman, New York, 1958).
Lahr, J., and Pomeroy, P. W., Bull. Am. seism. Soc., 60, 1245 (1970).
Su, S. S., Bull. Am. seism. Soc., 59, 459 (1969).
Allen, C. R., et al., Prof. Pap. US geol. Surv., 733, 17 (1971).
Thatcher, W. R., Science, 184, 1283 (1974).
Thatcher, W. R., J. geophys. Res., 80, 4862 (1975).
Kanamori, H., and Cipar, J., Phys. Earth planet Interiors, 9, 128 (1974).
Kanamori, H., and Anderson, D. L., J. geophys. Res., 80, 1075 (1975).
Johnston, M. J. S., and Morgenstern, C. E., Science, 186, 1031 (1974).
Scholz, C. H., J. geophys. Res., 73, 1417 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JONES, L., MOLNAR, P. Frequency of foreshocks. Nature 262, 677–679 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262677a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262677a0
Further reading
-
The seismogenic structures and migration characteristics of the 2021 Yangbi M6.4 Earthquake sequence in Yunnan, China
Science China Earth Sciences (2022)
-
Seismic rate variations prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 giant megathrust earthquake
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Preseismic atmospheric radon anomaly associated with 2018 Northern Osaka earthquake
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Experimental exploration of damage propagation in rocks using acoustic emission
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment (2021)
-
Seismic and Aseismic Preparatory Processes Before Large Stick–Slip Failure
Pure and Applied Geophysics (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.