Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Separation of suppressor and killer T cells by surface phenotype

Abstract

AMONG thymus-derived (T) lymphocytes of the mouse, several functionally distinct subsets may be identified (for review, see ref. 1). Early studies have shown synergy in graft-versus-host reactions of different populations of lymphoid cells2, and in vitro studies have demonstrated interactions between cells from anti-lymphocyte serum-treated mice (T1 cells) and adult thymectomised mice (T2 cells)3. A similar synergy has been observed in the generation of T helper and T suppressor cells in vitro4. Clearer definition of the subsets of T cells interacting in the induction of immune responses has come from the use of allo-antisera recognising differentiation antigens on T cells. In particular, the use of antisera to the Ly series of antigens5 has enabled the separation of amplifying (MLR) cells from killer cells6. Similarly in the humoral response helper T cells can be distinguished from suppressor T cells7. In this report, we show that killer and suppressor T cells, both generated in vitro and carrying the Ly-2 and 3 antigens can also be separated using antisera to surface antigenic markers. We also present data suggesting that suppressor cells of similar phenotype may have an important function in vivo in the immune response.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beverley, P. C. L., in T and B Lymphocytes in Immune Recognition (edit. by Loor, F., and Roelants, G.) (Wiley, Chichester, UK, in the press).

  2. Cantor, H., and Asofsky, R., J. exp. Med., 131, 235–246 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Simpson, E., and Cantor, H., Eur. J. Immun., 1, 337–343 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldmann, M., Erb, P., Kontiainen, S., and Dunkley, M., in Membrane Receptors of Lymphocytes (edit. by Seligmann, M., Preud'homme, J. L., and Kourilsky, F. M.), 305–310 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyse, E. A., Myazawa, M., Aoki, T., and Old, L. J., Proc. R. Soc., B 170, 175–193 (1968).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantor, H., and Boyse, E. A., J. exp. Med., 141, 1389–1399 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feldmann, M., Beverley, P. C. L., Dunkley, M., and Kontiainen, S., Nature, 258, 614–616 (1975).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kontiainen, S., and Feldmann, M., Eur. J. Immun. (in the press).

  9. Wagner, H., and Feldmann, M., Cell. Immun., 4, 39–50 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kontiainen, S., and Feldmann, M., Nature new Biol., 245, 285–286 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simpson, E., Gordon, R., Taylor, M., Mertin, J., and Chandler, P., Eur. J. Immun., 5, 451–455 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheid, M., Boyse, E. A., Carswell, E. A., and Old, L. J., J. exp. Med., 135, 938–955 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammerling, G. J., Deak, B. D., Mauve, D., Hammerling, U., and McDevitt, H. O., Immunogenetics, 1, 68–81 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein, J., in Biology of the Mouse Histocompatibility Complex, 451 (Springer, Berlin, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Julius, M. H., Simpson, E., and Herzenberg, L. A., Eur. J. Immun., 3, 645–649 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiku, H., et al., J. exp. Med., 141, 227–241 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammerling, G. J., Black, S. J., Segal, S., and Eichmann, K., Proc. Tenth Leukocyte Culture Conf. (edit. by Eijvoogel, V. P., Roos, D. and Zeiljmaker, W. P.), 367–378 (Academic, New York and London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tada, T., Taniguchi, M., and Takemori, T., Transplant. Rev., 26, 106–129 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sachs, D. H., and Cone, J. L., J. exp. Med., 138, 1289–1304 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Frelinger, J. A., Niederhuber, J. E., David, C. S., and Shreffler, D. C., J. exp. Med., 140, 1273–1284 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cantor, H., and Boyse, E. A., J. exp. Med., 141, 1376–1389 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cantor, H., Shen, F. W., and Boyse, E. A., J. exp. Med., 143, 1391–1401 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vadas, M. A., et al., J. exp. Med. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BEVERLEY, P., WOODY, J., DUNKLEY, M. et al. Separation of suppressor and killer T cells by surface phenotype. Nature 262, 495–497 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262495a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262495a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing