Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Statistical interpretation of enthalpy–entropy compensation


TYPICALLY, enthalpy and entropy estimates from kinetic and equilibrium data are highly correlated, varying in a linear fashion with one another (enthalpy–entropy compensation effect). This effect can be readily explained in most cases simply as a statistical or data handling artefact. The statistical analysis presented here reveals three novel insights. First, the enthalpy and entropy parameter estimates are highly correlated, such that estimated correlation coefficients > 0.95, say, do not imply chemical causation. Second, enthalpy and entropy estimates are distributed by experimental and measurement errors in elliptical probability regions that are very elongated and appear as lines. The slope of such lines is the harmonic mean of the experimental temperatures. Third, estimates of enthalpy and free energy at the harmonic mean of the experimental temperatures are not statistically correlated, so any observed structured variation between these parameter estimates arises from the chemical effect alone. Note that, since the thermodynamic potentials are interrelated by the Maxwell relationships, a correlation between any two potentials can be transformed to give the corresponding correlation between any other two. We now discuss these results to resolve a number of issues concerning a much disputed data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Leffler, J. E., and Grunwald, E., Rates and Equilibria of Organic Reactions, 315–402 (Wiley, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leffler, J. E., J. org. Chem., 20, 1202–1231 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Craft, M. J., and Lester, C. T., J. Am. chem. Soc., 73, 1127–1128 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leffler, J. E., Nature, 205, 1101–1102 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Exner, O., Coll. Czech. chem. commun., 29, 1094–1113 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Exner, O., Nature, 201, 488–490 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammett, L. P., Physical Organic Chemistry, 391–408 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lumry, R., and Rajender, J., Biopolymers, 9, 1125–1227 (1970); J. phys. Chem., 75, 1387–1401 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Exner, O., Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 37, 1425–1444 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Exner, O., Nature, 227, 366–367 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackadder, D. A., and Hinshelwood, C., J. chem. Soc., 2720–2727 (1958).

  12. Leffler, J. E., J. org. Chem., 31, 533–537 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, R. F., J. org. Chem., 27, 3015–3026 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KRUG, R., HUNTER, W. & GRIEGER, R. Statistical interpretation of enthalpy–entropy compensation. Nature 261, 566–567 (1976).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing