Letter | Published:

Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres

Naturevolume 260pages799802 (1976) | Download Citation



THE ionic channel associated with the acetylcholine (ACh) receptor at the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscle fibres is probably the best described channel in biological membranes. Nevertheless, the properties of individual channels are still unknown, as previous studies were concerned with average population properties. Macroscopic conductance fluctuations occurring in the presence of ACh were analysed to provide estimates for single channel conductance and mean open times1–3. The values obtained, however, depended on assumptions about the shape of the elementary conductance contribution—for example, that the elementary contribution is a square pulse-like event2. Clearly, it would be of great interest to refine techniques of conductance measurement in order to resolve discrete changes in conductance which are expected to occur when single channels open or close. This has not been possible so far because of excessive extraneous background noise. We report on a more sensitive method of conductance measurement, which, in appropriate conditions, reveals discrete changes in conductance that show many of the features that have been postulated for single ionic channels.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Katz, B., and Miledi, R., J. Physiol., Lond., 224, 665–699 (1972).

  2. 2

    Anderson, C. R., and Stevens, C. F., J. Physiol., Lond., 235, 655–691 (1973).

  3. 3

    Ben Haim, D., Dreyer, F., and Peper, K., Pflu¨gers Arch. ges. Physiol., 355, 19–26 (1975).

  4. 4

    Stockholm, A., J. gen. Physiol., 44, 1073–1087 (1961).

  5. 5

    Frank, K., and Tauc, L., in The Cellular Function of Membrane Transport (edit. by Hoffman, J.) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963).

  6. 6

    Neher, E., and Lux, H. D., Pflu¨gers Arch. ges. Physiol., 311, 272–277 (1969).

  7. 7

    Fishman, H. M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 876–879 (1973).

  8. 8

    Takeuchi, A., and Takeuchi, N., J. Neurophysiol., 22, 395–411 (1959).

  9. 9

    Betz, W., and Sakmann, B., J. Physiol., Lond., 230, 673–688 (1973).

  10. 10

    Neher, E., and Sakmann, B., Pflu¨gers Arch. ges. Physiol., 355, R63 (1975).

  11. 11

    Dreyer, F., Walther, Ch., and Peper, K., Pflu¨gers Arch. ges. Physiol., 359, R71 (1975).

  12. 12

    Neher, E., and Sakmann, B., J. Physiol., Lond. (in the press).

  13. 13

    Hladky, S. B., and Haydon, D. A., Nature, 225, 451–453 (1970).

  14. 14

    Katz, B., and Miledi, R., J. Physiol., Lond., 230, 707–717 (1973).

  15. 15

    Colquhoun, D., Dionne, V. E., Steinbach, J. H., and Stevens, C. F., Nature, 253, 204–206 (1975).

Download references

Author information


  1. Department of Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticutt, 06510

  2. Max-Planck-lnstitut für Biophysikalische Chemie, 3400 Göttingen, Am Fassberg, West Germany



  1. Search for ERWIN NEHER in:

  2. Search for BERT SAKMANN in:

About this article

Publication history



Issue Date



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.