Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differential chromatid staining by in vivo treatment as a mutagenicity test system

Abstract

DIFFERENTIAL staining of sister chromatids can be demonstrated with Hoechst 33258 fluorochrome1 and with Giemsa after special pretreatment2, even if 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) is present during the first S phase only3. These techniques permit the use of the phenomenon of the sister chromatid exchange (SCE). The average spontaneous rate of 10–14 SCEs per metaphase seems to be fairly constant in all cultures from several species4,5. A variety of mutagenic factors (that is, ultraviolet light and alkylating agents) produce very high frequencies of SCE even at concentrations far below the level necessary for the induction of chromosomal breakage, whereas others, like X rays or certain chemicals, hardly influence the rate of SCE6. Because of the high turnover of BrdU in the liver and the physiologically available thymidine, differential chromatid staining has so far only been produced in in vitro systems (cell cultures) and in the chicken embryo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Latt, S., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 3395–3399 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perry, P., and Wolff, S., Nature, 251, 156–158 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Korenberg, J. R., and Freedlender, E. F., Chromosoma, 48, 355–360 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff, S., and Perry, P., Chromosoma, 48, 341–353 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Galloway, S. M., and Evans, H. J., Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 15, 17–29 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry, P., and Evans, H. J., Nature, 258, 121–125 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloom, S. E., and Hsu, T. C., Chromosoma, 51, 261–267 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Epplen, J. T., Siebers, J.-W., and Vogel, W., Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 15, 177–185 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Savage, K. R., Nature, 258, 103–104 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VOGEL, W., BAUKNECHT, T. Differential chromatid staining by in vivo treatment as a mutagenicity test system. Nature 260, 448–449 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/260448a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/260448a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing