Letter | Published:

Cytogenetic effects of plutonium-239 in male mice

Naturevolume 256pages577578 (1975) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

INCREASING quantities of plutonium-239 are processed in the nuclear power industry. The likely magnitude of the associated genetic risk is still uncertain but thought to be less than the risk of cancer induction1. Green et al.2 have recently shown, however, that plutonium reaching the testis after intravenous injection of 239Pu citrate into CBA mice concentrates in the interstitial tissue, outside the seminiferous tubules. They calculated that the average dose rate to spermatogonial stem cells, in which genetic damage can accumulate, was about 2–2.5 times that to the whole testis. In these circumstances, the genetically significant dose is higher than the average tissue dose, which is that normally used for protection purposes1. To obtain more direct evidence on genetic damage from gonadal plutonium, we are studying the induction of chromosome aberrations in germ cells of male mice after protracted exposure to α particles from 239Pu. The results of the first experiment, described here, suggest that α radiation has the expected high relative biological effectiveness (RBE)3 for induction of chromosome damage and that a distribution factor of the magnitude proposed may indeed be operating as well.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Medical Research Council, The Toxicity of Plutonium (HMSO, London, 1975).

  2. 2

    Green, D., Howells, G. R., Humphreys, E. R., and Vennart, J., Nature, 255, 77 (1975).

  3. 3

    ICRP, Recommendations (ICRP publication 9, Pergamon, Oxford, 1966).

  4. 4

    Evans, E. P., Breckon, G., and Ford, C. E., Cytogenetics, 3, 289–294 (1964).

  5. 5

    Searle, A. G., and Beechey, C. V., Mutat. Res. 22, 63–72 (1974).

  6. 6

    Bruce, W. R., Furrer, R., and Wyrobek, A. J., Mutat. Res., 23, 381–386 (1974).

  7. 7

    Léonard, A., Mutat. Res., 11, 71–88 (1971).

  8. 8

    Searle, A. G., and Beechey, C. V., Mutat. Res., 24, 171–186 (1974).

  9. 9

    Leonard, A., and Deknudt, G., Radiat. Res., 40, 276–284 (1969).

  10. 10

    Lyon, M. F., and Morris, T., Mutat. Res., 8, 191–198 (1969).

  11. 11

    Searle, A. G., Evans, E. P., and West, B. J., Mutat. Res., 7, 235–240 (1969).

  12. 12

    Russell, W. L., Genetics, 41, 658–659 (1956).

  13. 13

    Oakberg, E. F., Nature, 180, 1137–1139 (1957).

  14. 14

    Searle, A. G., Evans, E. P., Ford, C. E., and West, B. J., Mutat. Res., 6, 427–436 (1968).

  15. 15

    ICRP, The RBE for High-LET Radiations with respect to Mutagenesis (ICRP publication 18, Pergamon, Oxford, 1972).

  16. 16

    Lederer, C. M., Hollander, J. M., and Perlman, I., Table of Isotopes, sixth ed. (Wiley, New York, 1967).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 ORD, UK

    • C. V. BEECHEY
    • , D. GREEN
    • , E. R. HUMPHREYS
    •  & A. G. SEARLE

Authors

  1. Search for C. V. BEECHEY in:

  2. Search for D. GREEN in:

  3. Search for E. R. HUMPHREYS in:

  4. Search for A. G. SEARLE in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/256577a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.