Letter | Published:

Left-handed to right-handed helix conversion in Salmonella flagella

Naturevolume 254pages332334 (1975) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

ALTHOUGH bacterial flagella can assume various helical configurations1–3, the ‘normal’ and ‘curly’ configurations are encountered most frequently in nature. In Salmonella, normal and curly flagella have helical pitches of about 2.3 and 1.1 µm, respectively4. Macnab and Koshland5 observed that normal flagella of living Salmonella were left-handed helical filaments, as shown for Proteus and Bacillus6. Flagella with this handedness and rotating counterclockwise (looking in the direction of travel), would cause helical waves to propagate distally and provide forward thrust7–9. Normal flagella can transform reversibly into the curly type when physiological conditions, such as pH, are varied10,11: this has been termed biplicity. Asakura et al.12, using Salmonella strain SJ670 and others, found that reconstituted flagellar filaments also could be transformed reversibly, although they could not control this transformation completely. SJ670 is a motile strain that produces normal flagella. On the other hand, the mutant SJ30 isolated by lino13 produces flagella which are stable in the curly configuration in various conditions. The mutation is in the structural gene for the flagellar protein subumit, flagellin, and the mutant cannot swim normally tout appears to tumble continuously. Now, using SJ670 and SJ30, we have found that, whereas the normal configuration of flagella is a left-handed helix, the curly configuration is a right-handed helix.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Leifson, E. Atlas of bacterial flagellation (Academic, New York and London, 1960).

  2. 2

    Iino, T., Bact., Rev., 33, 454–475 (1969).

  3. 3

    Asakura, S., Adv. Biophys., 1, 99–155 (1970).

  4. 4

    Pijper, A., Neser, M. L., and Abraham, G., J. gen. Microbiol., 14, 371–380 (1956).

  5. 5

    Macnab, R. M., and Koshland, D. E., J. molec. Biol., 84, 399–406 (1974).

  6. 6

    Weibull, C., Ark. Kemi., 1, 573–575 (1949).

  7. 7

    Silverman, M., and Simon, M., Nature, 249, 73–74 (1974).

  8. 8

    Larsen, S. H., Reader, R. W., Kort, E. N., Tso, W.-W., and Adler, J., Nature, 249, 74–77 (1974).

  9. 9

    Berg, H. C., Nature, 249, 77–79 (1974).

  10. 10

    Pijper, A., Ergebn. Mikrobiol. ImmunForsch. exp. Ther., 30, 37–91 (1957).

  11. 11

    Leifson, E., Carhart, S. R., and Fulton, M., J. Bact., 69, 73–82 (1955).

  12. 12

    Asakura, S., Eguchi, G., and Iino, T., J. molec. Biol., 16, 302–316 (1966).

  13. 13

    Iino, T., J. gen. Microbiol., 27, 167–175 (1962).

  14. 14

    Asakura, S., and Iino, T., J. molec. Biol., 64, 251–268 (1972).

  15. 15

    Asakura, S., and Oosawa, F., J. Polymer Sci., 33, 183–192 (1958).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Nagoya University, Japan

    • KATSUHIKO SHIMADA
    • , RITSU KAMIYA
    •  & SHO ASAKURA

Authors

  1. Search for KATSUHIKO SHIMADA in:

  2. Search for RITSU KAMIYA in:

  3. Search for SHO ASAKURA in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/254332a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.