News | Published:

Plutonium particles: some like them hot

Naturevolume 254pages278280 (1975) | Download Citation

Subjects

The Medical Research Council's 1975 report The Toxicity of Plutonium (Nature, 253, 385) concludes that “there is no evidence that irradiation by ‘hot particles’ in the lung is markedly more hazardous than the same activity uniformly distributed or that the currently recommended standards for inhalation of plutonium are seriously in error.” Report R29 (1974) of the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) states that “there is no biological evidence available at present which suggests that ‘hot spots’ carry a higher risk of cancer induction.” But in the March 20, 1975 New Scientist, Dr A. R. Tamplin warns: “The plutonium exposure standards … must and will eventually be made more restrictive by a factor approaching 1,000.” Behind this disagreement is a major controversy over the risk of lung cancer from inhaled insoluble particles of intensely radioactive alpha emitters such as plutonium. In that controversy—unresolved by any direct data—lies a source of uncertainty about the future of nuclear power. A report by Amory B. Lovins and Walter C. Patterson of Friends of the Earth.

Authors

  1. Search for Amory B. Lovins in:

  2. Search for Walter C. Patterson in:

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/254278a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing