Letter | Published:

The Laschamp geomagnetic ‘event’

Nature volume 253, pages 705707 (27 February 1975) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

SHORT lived geomagnetic ‘events’ provide useful stratigraphic markers; they may enhance climatic and evolutionary changes1,2 and they provide stringent parameters for geomagnetic models. During such events the virtual geomagnetic pole undergoes excursions outside the usual range of secular variation but they are usually brief, generally lasting about 105 yr, so that their magnetic record in deep sea sediments is often lost because of post-depositional remagnetisation3 and because of biological activity in the upper few decimetres of the sediments4. In lake sediments, where sedimentation is more rapid, the magnetic record is better preserved. Dating is, however, difficult because secular variations in atmospheric carbon isotopes and irregular distributions in the environment are known to produce errors. Furthermore, geomagnetic events, the levels of which may have been displaced by bioturbation4, are usually dated by assuming uniform sedimentation between 14C dated horizons. The Laschamp event, in particular, seems to have been detected at 12 locations although the reported age (Table 1) varies between 7,000 and 17,000 yr BP, a range outside the quoted error for individual determinations, but within the realistic error in dating.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:

    $199

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , and , Nature, 250, 563–565 (1974).

  2. 2.

    , Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 77, 197–203 (1966).

  3. 3.

    , and , Sedimentology, 3, 135–143 (1964).

  4. 4.

    , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 4, 341–349 (1968).

  5. 5.

    , , and , Proc. Swed. geothech. Inst., 1, (1950).

  6. 6.

    , Ark. Mat, Astr. Phys., 29A, (5), 1–37 (1942).

  7. 7.

    , Ark. Geofys., 3, (1), 1–34 (1958).

  8. 8.

    , , and , W, Terr. Magn. atmos. Elect., 53, 349–372 (1948).

  9. 9.

    , , , and , Nature phys. Sci., 237, 42–43 (1972).

  10. 10.

    , Sver. geol. Unders. Ath., C640, 1–487 (1968).

  11. 11.

    , Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 24, 429–434 (1971).

  12. 12.

    , in Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology, (edit. by Olsson), 173–196 (1970).

  13. 13.

    , and , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 19, 113–119 (1973).

  14. 14.

    , Nature, 242, 518–519 (1973).

  15. 15.

    , and , C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, 264, 92–94 (1967).

  16. 16.

    , and , Eos., 51, 270 (1970).

  17. 17.

    , , and , Nature phys. Sci., 234, 173–174 (1971).

  18. 18.

    , and , Nature, 251, 408–409 (1974).

  19. 19.

    , Eos., 55, 224 (1974).

  20. 20.

    , and , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 13, 181–190 (1971).

  21. 21.

    , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 12, 332–338 (1971).

  22. 22.

    , Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 6 (in the press).

  23. 23.

    , and , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 19, 267–274 (1973).

  24. 24.

    , and , Eos., 55, 224 (1973).

  25. 25.

    , and , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 24, 99–104 (1974).

  26. 26.

    , , , , and , Proc. Japan Acad., 48, 186–190 (1972).

  27. 27.

    , , , and , Nature phys. Sci., 244, 8–10 (1973).

  28. 28.

    , and , Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 6, 43–46 (1969).

  29. 29.

    , and , Science, 163, 565–567 (1969).

  30. 30.

    , and , Nature, 239, 327–330 (1972).

  31. 31.

    , in Palaeogeophysics (edit. by Runcorn, S. K.,) 193–208 (Academic, London, 1970).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

    • MARK NÖEL
    •  & D. H. TARLING

Authors

  1. Search for MARK NÖEL in:

  2. Search for D. H. TARLING in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/253705a0

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.