Abstract
IT is generally believed that total destruction of visual cortex and optic radiations in man should lead to blindness, and that regional (subtotal) destruction should correspondingly produce circumscribed areas of blindness (“scotomata”) in the visual field1. Such areas of blindness are defined by a patient's inability to detect and report visual stimuli projected into the affected region. Standard methods of visual field testing (perimetry) suggest that such scotomata may be “absolute”, that is the patient seems to be unable to distinguish between the presence and absence of visually presented targets whenever they are presented in the scotomatous area. Suspecting that the response of the visual system may depend on the task requirements, we used a technique which requires a localizing response from the patient2, in addition to clinical perimetry. As a result, we have found evidence for the processing of information about the locus of light stimuli presented in areas of the visual field which are “blind” by the traditional definition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Visual instrumental learning in blindsight monkeys
Scientific Reports Open Access 20 July 2021
-
Conscious awareness modulates processing speed in the redundant signal effect
Experimental Brain Research Open Access 17 April 2021
-
The posterior parietal cortex contributes to visuomotor processing for saccades in blindsight macaques
Communications Biology Open Access 04 March 2021
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
References
Teuber, H.-L., Battersby, W. S., and Bender, M. B., Visual Field Defects after Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1960).
Held, R., in The Neurosciences—Second Study Program (edit. by Schmitt, F. O.), 317 (Rockefeller Press, New York, 1970).
Magoun, H. W., and Ranson, S. W., Arch. Ophthalmol., 13, 791 (1935).
Edinger, U., and Fischer, B., Pflügers Archiv., 152, 535 (1913).
Levinsohn, G., Zeitschrift ges. Neurol Psychiat., 20, 377 (1913).
Brindley, G. S., Gautier-Smith, P. C., and Lewin, W., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 32, 259 (1969).
ter Braak, J. W. G., Schenk, V. W. D., and van Vliet, A. G. M., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 34, 140 (1971).
Richards, W., Exp. Brain Res. (in the press).
Klüver, H., Biol. Symp., 7, 253 (1942).
Sprague, J. M., Science, 153, 1544 (1966).
Humphrey, N. K., and Weiskrantz, L., Nature, 215, 595 (1967).
Schneider, G. E., Science, 163, 895 (1969).
Pasik, T., and Pasik, P., Vision Res. Suppl., 3, 419 (1971).
Killackey, H., Snyder, M., and Diamond, I. T., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. Monog., 74, 1 (1971).
Sloan, L. L., Arch. Ophthalmol., 86, 612 (1971).
Robinson, D., Proc. IEEE, 56, 1032 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PÖPPEL, E., HELD, R. & FROST, D. Residual Visual Function after Brain Wounds involving the Central Visual Pathways in Man. Nature 243, 295–296 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/243295a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/243295a0
This article is cited by
-
Visual instrumental learning in blindsight monkeys
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
The posterior parietal cortex contributes to visuomotor processing for saccades in blindsight macaques
Communications Biology (2021)
-
Conscious awareness modulates processing speed in the redundant signal effect
Experimental Brain Research (2021)
-
Dissecting the circuit for blindsight to reveal the critical role of pulvinar and superior colliculus
Nature Communications (2019)
-
Stereoscopic visual area connectivity: a diffusion tensor imaging study
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.