Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Acute Leukemias

Cytogenetics, molecular and ultrastructural characteristics of biphenotypic acute leukemia identified by the EGIL scoring system

Abstract

Biphenotypic acute leukemia (BAL) is a rare, difficult to diagnose entity. Its identification is important for risk stratification in acute leukemia (AL). The scoring proposal of the European Group for the Classification of Acute Leukemia (EGIL) is useful for this purpose, but its performance against objective benchmarks is unclear. Using the EGIL system, we identified 23 (3.4%) BAL from among 676 newly diagnosed AL patients. Mixed, small and large blast cells predominated, with FAB M2 and L1 constituting the majority. All patients were positive for myeloid (M) markers and either B cell (B) (17 or 74%) or T cell (T) (8 or 34%) markers with two exceptional patients demonstrating trilineage phenotype. Six (50%) of studied M-B cases were positive for both IGH and TCR. In six (26%) patients myeloid lineage commitment was also demonstrable by electron cytochemistry. Abnormal findings were present in 19 (83%) patients by cytogenetics/FISH/molecular analysis as follows: t(9;22) (17%); MLL gene rearrangement (26%); deletion(6q) (13%); 12p11.2 (9%); numerical abnormalities (13%), and three (13%) new, previously unreported translocations t(X;6)(p22.3;q21); t(2;6)(q37;p21.3); and t(8;14)(p21;q32). In conclusion, the EGIL criteria for BAL appear robust when compared against molecular techniques that, if applied routinely, could aid in detecting BAL and help in risk stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, James W . Vardiman, Pathology and Genetics, Tumor of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC Press: Lyon, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bain BJ, Barnett D, Linch D, Matutes E, Reilly JT . Revised guideline on immunophenotyping in acute leukemias and chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. Clin Lab Haem 2002; 24: 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCulloch EA . Stem cells in normal and leukemic hemopoiesis. Henry Stratton Lecture 1982. Blood 1983; 62: 1–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawyers CL, Denny CT, Witte ON . Leukemia and the disruption of normal hematopoiesis. Cell 1991; 64: 337–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Mitterbauer G, Simonitsch I, Jaeger U, Lechn K, Schneider B et al. The immunophenotype of 325 adult acute leukemias: relationship to morphologic and molecular classification and proposal for a minimal screening program highly predictive for lineage discrimination. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117: 380–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Altman AJ . Clinical features and biological implications of acute mixed lineage (hybrid) leukemias. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1990; 12: 123–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanson CA, Abaza M, Sheldon S, Ross CW, Schnitzer B, Stoolman LM . Acute biphenotypic leukaemia: immunophenotypic and cytogenetic analysis. Br J Haematol 1993; 84: 49–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, Ludwig WD, Matutes E, Orfao A, et al., For the European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL). Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. Leukemia 1995; 9: 1783–1786.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Legrand O, Perrot JY, Simonin G, Baudard M, Cadiou M, Blanc C et al. Adult biphenotypic acute leukemia: an entity with poor prognosis which is related to unfavourable cytogenetics and P-glycoprotein over-expression. Br J Haematol 1998; 100: 147–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sulak LE, Clare CN, Morale BA, Hansen KL, Montiel MM . Biphenotypic acute leukemia in adults. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94: 54–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Y, Li J, Xue Y, Zhu M, Lu D, Geng M et al. Acute biphenotypic leukemia in the adults. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2002; 24: 375–377.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitt-Graff A, Jurgens H, Reifenhauser A, Schwamborn D, Gobel U . Childhood biphenotypic leukemia: detection of mixed lymphoid and myeloid populations in bone marrow specimens. Hum Pathol 1998; 19: 651–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buccheri V, Matutes E, Dyer MJS, Catovsky D . Lineage commitment in biphenotypic acute leukemia. Leukemia 1993; 7: 919–927.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Killick S, Matutes E, Powles RL, Hamblin M, Swansbury J, Treleaven JG et al. Outcome of biphenotypic acute leukemia. Haematologica 1999; 84: 699–706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carbonell F, Swansbury J, Min T, Matutes E, Farahat N, Buccheri V et al. Cytogenetic findings in acute biphenotypic leukaemia. Leukemia 1996; 10: 1283–1287.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shetty V, Chitale A, Matutes E, Buccheri V, Morilla R, Catovsky D . Immunological and ultrastructural studies in acute biphenotypic leukemia. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 903–907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moscinski LC, Nowell PC, Hoxie JA, Berger MS, Prytowsky MB . Surface marker analysis and karyotype distinguish acute biphenotypic leukemia from acute myelogenous leukemia expressing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Cancer 1991; 68: 2161–2168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brigaudau C, Bilhou-Nabera C . del (6q) abnormalities in lymphoid malignancies. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 1998, URL: http://www.infobiogen.fr/services/chromcancer/Anomalies/del6qID1148.html.

  19. Al-Qurashi F, Owaidah T, Iqbal MA, Aljurf M . Trisomy 4 as the sole karyotypic abnormality in a case of acute biphenotypic leukemia with T-lineage markers in minimally differentiated acute myelocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2004; 150: 66–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brumpt C, Delabesse E, Beldjord K, Davi F, Cayuela JM, Millien C et al. The incidence of clonal T-cell receptor rearrangements in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia varies with age and genotype. Blood 2000; 96: 2254–2261.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Z, Le Paslier D, Dausset J, Degos L, Flandrin G, Cohen D et al. Human T cell gamma genes are frequently rearranged in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemias but not in chronic B-cell proliferations. J Exp Med 1987; 165: 1000–1015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Height SE, Swansbury GJ, Matutes E, Treleaven JG, Catovsky D, Dyer MJS . Analysis of clonal rearrangements of the Ig heavy chain locus in acute leukemia. Blood 1996; 87: 5242–5250.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Szczepanski T, Willemse MJ, Brinkhof B, van Wering ER, van der Burg M, van Dongen JJM . Comparative analysis of Ig and TCR gene rearrangements at diagnosis and at relapse of childhood precursor B-ALL provides improved strategies for selection of stable PCR targets for monitoring of minimal residual disease. Blood 2002; 99: 2315–2323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T M Owaidah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Owaidah, T., Beihany, A., Iqbal, M. et al. Cytogenetics, molecular and ultrastructural characteristics of biphenotypic acute leukemia identified by the EGIL scoring system. Leukemia 20, 620–626 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404128

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links