Abstract
We evaluated the impact of genetic analysis combining cytogenetics and broad molecular screening on leukemia diagnosis according to World Health Organization (WHO) and on genetic risk assignment. A two-step nested multiplex RT–PCR assay was used that allowed the detection of 29 fusion transcripts. A total of 186 patients (104 males (56%), 174 adults (94%), 12 children (6%), 155 AML (83%), 31 ALL (17%)) characterized by morphology and immunophenotyping were included. Of these 186 patients, 120 (65%) had a genetic abnormality. Molecular typing revealed a fusion transcript in 49 (26%) patients and cytogenetic analysis revealed an abnormal karyotype in 119 (64%). A total of 27 (14%) cases were genetically classified as favorable, 107 (58%) intermediate and 52 (28%) unfavorable. For 38 (20%) patients, there was a discrepancy in the genetic risk assignments obtained from broad molecular screening and cytogenetics. Cryptic fusion transcripts in nine (5%) patients changed the genetic risk assignment in four and the WHO classification in four patients. In 34 patients (18%), cytogenetics defined the risk assignment by revealing structural and numerical chromosomal abnormalities not detected by molecular screening. Broad molecular screening and cytogenetics are complementary in the diagnosis and genetic risk assignment of acute leukemia.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Look AT . Oncogenic transcription factors in the human acute leukemias. Science 1997; 278: 1059–1064.
Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW . World Health Organisation Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001.
Druker BJ . Imatinib as a paradigm of targeted therapies. Adv Cancer Res 2004; 91: 1–30.
Tallman MS, Rowe JM . Acute promyelocytic leukemia: a paradigm for differentiation therapy with retinoic acid. Blood Rev 1994; 8: 70–78.
Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 2002; 100: 4325–4336.
Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 1998; 92: 2322–2333.
Pallisgaard N, Hokland P, Riishoj DC, Pedersen B, Jorgensen P . Multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous screening of 29 translocations and chromosomal aberrations in acute leukemia. Blood 1998; 92: 574–588.
Strehl S, Konig M, Mann G, Haas OA . Multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction screening in childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood 2001; 97: 805–808.
Elia L, Mancini M, Moleti L, Meloni G, Buffolino S, Krampera M et al. A multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction strategy for the diagnostic molecular screening of chimeric genes: a clinical evaluation on 170 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2003; 88: 275–279.
Zach O, Kessler B, Stammler M, Girschikofski M, Krieger O, Kasparu H et al. Comparison of a multiplex RT-PCR assay with cytogenetic analyses in adult hematologic neoplasms. Hematol J 2004; 5 (Suppl 2): 77.
Castagné C, Mühlematter D, van Melle G, Gachoud V, Jotterand Bellomo M . Effect of conditioned media, nutritive elements, and mitotic synchronization on the accuracy of the cytogenetic analysis in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia patients presenting with inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(15;17). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997; 94: 106–112.
Jotterand Bellomo M, Parlier V, Mühlematter D, Grob JP, Beris P . Three new cases of chromosome 3 rearrangement in bands q21 and q26 with abnormal thrombopoiesis bring further evidence to the existence of a 3q21q26 syndrome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1992; 59: 138–160.
Mitelman F . An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel: Karger, 1995.
Mrozek K, Heerema NA, Bloomfield CD . Cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Blood Rev 2004; 18: 115–136.
Suciu S, Mandelli F, de Witte T, Zittoun R, Gallo E, Labar B et al. Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial. Blood 2003; 102: 1232–1240.
Byrd JC, Ruppert AS, Mrozek K, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC et al. Repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine benefit patients with acute myeloid leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): results from CALGB 8461. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1087–1094.
Byrd JC, Dodge RK, Carroll A, Baer MR, Edwards C, Stamberg J et al. Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3767–3775.
de Botton S, Chevret S, Sanz M, Dombret H, Thomas X, Guerci A et al. Additional chromosomal abnormalities in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) do not confer poor prognosis: results of APL 93 trial. Br J Haematol 2000; 111: 801–806.
Bienz M, Ludwig M, Mueller BU, Leibundgut EO, Ratschiller D, Solenthaler M et al. Risk assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a normal karyotype. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 1416–1424.
Acknowledgements
We thank Heike Huxol and her team for performing the Multiplex RT-PCR assay. We are grateful to all collaborators at the Unité de cytogénétique du cancer for karyotype analysis and text revision. We also thank Bernard Chapuis for referring patients from the University Hospital of Geneva and David Betts for performing some of the cytogenetic analysis. We are grateful to Patrick King for carefully reading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer-Monard, S., Parlier, V., Passweg, J. et al. Combination of broad molecular screening and cytogenetic analysis for genetic risk assignment and diagnosis in patients with acute leukemia. Leukemia 20, 247–253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404044
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404044
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Molecular analysis of more than 140 gene fusion variants and aberrant activation of EVI1 and TLX1 in hematological malignancies
Annals of Hematology (2017)
-
Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
International Journal of Hematology (2008)