Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Acute Leukemias

Combination of broad molecular screening and cytogenetic analysis for genetic risk assignment and diagnosis in patients with acute leukemia


We evaluated the impact of genetic analysis combining cytogenetics and broad molecular screening on leukemia diagnosis according to World Health Organization (WHO) and on genetic risk assignment. A two-step nested multiplex RT–PCR assay was used that allowed the detection of 29 fusion transcripts. A total of 186 patients (104 males (56%), 174 adults (94%), 12 children (6%), 155 AML (83%), 31 ALL (17%)) characterized by morphology and immunophenotyping were included. Of these 186 patients, 120 (65%) had a genetic abnormality. Molecular typing revealed a fusion transcript in 49 (26%) patients and cytogenetic analysis revealed an abnormal karyotype in 119 (64%). A total of 27 (14%) cases were genetically classified as favorable, 107 (58%) intermediate and 52 (28%) unfavorable. For 38 (20%) patients, there was a discrepancy in the genetic risk assignments obtained from broad molecular screening and cytogenetics. Cryptic fusion transcripts in nine (5%) patients changed the genetic risk assignment in four and the WHO classification in four patients. In 34 patients (18%), cytogenetics defined the risk assignment by revealing structural and numerical chromosomal abnormalities not detected by molecular screening. Broad molecular screening and cytogenetics are complementary in the diagnosis and genetic risk assignment of acute leukemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Look AT . Oncogenic transcription factors in the human acute leukemias. Science 1997; 278: 1059–1064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW . World Health Organisation Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Druker BJ . Imatinib as a paradigm of targeted therapies. Adv Cancer Res 2004; 91: 1–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tallman MS, Rowe JM . Acute promyelocytic leukemia: a paradigm for differentiation therapy with retinoic acid. Blood Rev 1994; 8: 70–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 2002; 100: 4325–4336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 1998; 92: 2322–2333.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pallisgaard N, Hokland P, Riishoj DC, Pedersen B, Jorgensen P . Multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous screening of 29 translocations and chromosomal aberrations in acute leukemia. Blood 1998; 92: 574–588.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Strehl S, Konig M, Mann G, Haas OA . Multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction screening in childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood 2001; 97: 805–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elia L, Mancini M, Moleti L, Meloni G, Buffolino S, Krampera M et al. A multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction strategy for the diagnostic molecular screening of chimeric genes: a clinical evaluation on 170 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2003; 88: 275–279.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zach O, Kessler B, Stammler M, Girschikofski M, Krieger O, Kasparu H et al. Comparison of a multiplex RT-PCR assay with cytogenetic analyses in adult hematologic neoplasms. Hematol J 2004; 5 (Suppl 2): 77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castagné C, Mühlematter D, van Melle G, Gachoud V, Jotterand Bellomo M . Effect of conditioned media, nutritive elements, and mitotic synchronization on the accuracy of the cytogenetic analysis in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia patients presenting with inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(15;17). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997; 94: 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jotterand Bellomo M, Parlier V, Mühlematter D, Grob JP, Beris P . Three new cases of chromosome 3 rearrangement in bands q21 and q26 with abnormal thrombopoiesis bring further evidence to the existence of a 3q21q26 syndrome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1992; 59: 138–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitelman F . An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel: Karger, 1995.

  14. Mrozek K, Heerema NA, Bloomfield CD . Cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Blood Rev 2004; 18: 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suciu S, Mandelli F, de Witte T, Zittoun R, Gallo E, Labar B et al. Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial. Blood 2003; 102: 1232–1240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Byrd JC, Ruppert AS, Mrozek K, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC et al. Repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine benefit patients with acute myeloid leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): results from CALGB 8461. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1087–1094.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrd JC, Dodge RK, Carroll A, Baer MR, Edwards C, Stamberg J et al. Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3767–3775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Botton S, Chevret S, Sanz M, Dombret H, Thomas X, Guerci A et al. Additional chromosomal abnormalities in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) do not confer poor prognosis: results of APL 93 trial. Br J Haematol 2000; 111: 801–806.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bienz M, Ludwig M, Mueller BU, Leibundgut EO, Ratschiller D, Solenthaler M et al. Risk assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a normal karyotype. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 1416–1424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Heike Huxol and her team for performing the Multiplex RT-PCR assay. We are grateful to all collaborators at the Unité de cytogénétique du cancer for karyotype analysis and text revision. We also thank Bernard Chapuis for referring patients from the University Hospital of Geneva and David Betts for performing some of the cytogenetic analysis. We are grateful to Patrick King for carefully reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Meyer-Monard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer-Monard, S., Parlier, V., Passweg, J. et al. Combination of broad molecular screening and cytogenetic analysis for genetic risk assignment and diagnosis in patients with acute leukemia. Leukemia 20, 247–253 (2006).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


This article is cited by


Quick links