Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

Treatment strategy and results in children treated on three Dutch Childhood Oncology Group acute myeloid leukemia trials

Abstract

This report describes the long-term follow-up data of three consecutive Dutch Childhood Oncology Group acute myeloid leukemia (AML) protocols. A total of 303 children were diagnosed with AML, of whom 209 were eligible for this report. The first study was the AML-82 protocol. Results were inferior (5-year probability of overall survival (pOS) 31%) to other available regimes. Study AML-87 was based on the BFM-87 protocol, with prophylactic cranial irradiation in high-risk patients only, and without maintenance therapy. This led to a higher cumulative incidence of relapse than that reported by the Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster (BFM), but survival was similar (5-year pOS 47%), suggesting successful retrieval at relapse. The subsequent study AML-92/94 consisted of a modified BFM-93 protocol, that is, without maintenance therapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation. However, all patients were to be transplanted (auto- or allogeneic), although compliance was poor. Antileukemic efficacy was offset by an increase in the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality, especially in remission patients, and survival did not improve (5-year pOS 44%). Our results demonstrate that outcome in childhood AML is still unsatisfactory, and that further intensification of therapy carries the risk of enhanced toxicity. Our patients are currently included in the MRC AML studies, based on the results of their AML 10 trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Der Does-Van Den Berg A, Van Wering ER, Van Zanen GE . Acute niet-lymfatische leukemieën bij kinderen in Nederland (1972–1977). Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd 1978; 46: 146–153.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kamps WA, Veerman AJ, Van Wering ER, Van Weerden JF, Slater R, Does-van den Berg A . Long-term follow-up of Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG) protocols for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 1984–1991. Leukemia 2000; 14: 2240–2246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Der Does-Van Den Berg A, Hählen K, Colly LP, Vossen JM . Treatment of childhood acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with high-dose cytosine-arabinoside, 6-thioguanine and doxorubicin without maintenance therapy: pilot study ANLL-80 of the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1988; 5: 93–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Slats AM, Egeler RM, Van Der Does-Van Den Berg A, Korbijn C, Hählen K, Kamps WA et al. Causes of death – other than progressive leukemia – in childhood acute lymphoblastic (ALL) and myeloid leukemia (AML): the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group experience. Leukemia 2005; 19: 537–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinstein HJ, Mayer RJ, Rosenthal DS, Camitta BM, Coral FS, Nathan DG et al. Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia in children and adults. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 473–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Creutzig U, Ritter J, Schellong G, for the AML-BFM Study Group. Identification of two risk groups in childhood acute myelogenous leukemia after therapy intensification in study AML-BFM-83 as compared with study AML-BFM-78. Blood 1990; 75: 1932–1940.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Creutzig U, Ritter J, Zimmermann M, Schellong G . Does cranial irradiation reduce the risk for bone marrow relapse in acute myelogenous leukemia? Unexpected results of the Childhood Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Study BFM-87. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 279–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hählen K, Van Der Does-Van Den Berg A, Colly LP, Smets LA, Taminiau JA, Vossen JM . Treatment of childhood acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with individually scheduled high doses of cytarabine: preliminary results of study ANLL-82 of the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG). Haematol Blood Transfus 1987; 30: 389–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French–American–British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 620–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of acute leukemia of megakaryocyte lineage (M7). A report of the French–American–British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 460–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR et al. Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO). Br J Haematol 1991; 78: 325–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Ritter J, Reinhardt D, Hermann J, Henze G, et al., for the AML-BFM Study Group. Treatment strategy and long-term results in pediatric patients treated in four consecutive AML-BFM trials. Leukemia, this issue.

  13. Weinstein HJ, Mayer RJ, Rosenthal DS, Coral FS, Camitta BM, Gelber RD . Chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia in children and adults: VAPA update. Blood 1983; 62: 315–319.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Inati A, Sallan SE, Cassady JR, Hitchcock-Bryan S, Clavell LA, Belli JA et al. Efficacy and morbidity of central nervous system ‘prophylaxis’ in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: eight years’ experience with cranial irradiation and intrathecal methotrexate. Blood 1983; 61: 297–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinhardt D, Thiele C, Creutzig U . Neuropsychological sequelae in children with AML treated with or without prophylactic CNS-irradiation. Klin Pädiatr 2002; 214: 22–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leung W, Hudson MM, Strickland DK, Phipps S, Srivastava DK, Ribeiro RC et al. Late effects of treatment in survivors of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3273–3279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Champlin R, Jacobs A, Gale RP, Boccia R, Elashoff R, Foon K et al. Prolonged survival in acute myelogenous leukaemia without maintenance chemotherapy. Lancet 1984; 1: 894–896.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells RJ, Woods WG, Buckley JD, Odom LF, Benjamin D, Bernstein I et al. Treatment of newly diagnosed children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: a Childrens Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2367–2377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perel Y, Auvrignon A, Leblanc T, Vannier JP, Michel G, Nelken B et al. Impact of addition of maintenance therapy to intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy for childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia: results of a prospective randomized trial, LAME 89/91. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2774–2782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abbott BL, Rubnitz JE, Tong X, Srivastava DK, Pui CH, Ribeiro RC et al. Clinical significance of central nervous system involvement at diagnosis of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a single institution's experience. Leukemia 2003; 17: 2090–2096.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Creutzig U, Ritter J, Zimmermann M, Hermann J, Gadner H, Sawatzki DB et al. Idarubicin improves blast cell clearance during induction therapy in children with AML: results of study AML-BFM 93. Leukemia 2001; 15: 348–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Creutzig U, Ritter J, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D, Hermann J, Berthold F et al. Improved treatment results in high-risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients after intensification with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone: results of Study Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster 93. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2705–2713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berman E, Heller G, Santorsa J, McKenzie S, Gee T, Kempin S et al. Results of a randomized trial comparing idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin and cytosine arabinoside in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 1991; 77: 1666–1674.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiernik PH, Banks PL, Case Jr DC, Arlin ZA, Periman PO, Todd MB et al. Cytarabine plus idarubicin or daunorubicin as induction and consolidation therapy for previously untreated adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 1992; 79: 313–319.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vogler WR, Velez-Garcia E, Weiner RS, Flaum MA, Bartolucci AA, Omura GA et al. A phase III trial comparing idarubicin and daunorubicin in combination with cytarabine in acute myelogenous leukemia: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1103–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sackmann-Muriel F, Fernandez-Barbieri MA, Santarelli MT, Matus-Ridley M, Rosso A, Negri-Aranguren P et al. Results of treatment with an intensive combination induction regimen containing idarubicin in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia: preliminary report of the Argentine Group for Treatment of Acute Leukemia. Semin Oncol 1993; 20: 34–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reid JM, Pendergrass TW, Krailo MD, Hammond GD, Ames MM . Plasma pharmacokinetics and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of idarubicin and idarubicinol in pediatric leukemia patients: a Children's Cancer Study Group report. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 6525–6528.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Casazza AM . Experimental evaluation of anthracycline analogs. Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 835–844.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hiddemann W, Kreutzmann H, Straif K, Ludwig WD, Mertelsmann R, Donhuijsen-Ant R et al. High-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone: a highly effective regimen in refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 1987; 69: 744–749.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Amadori S, Testi AM, Aricò M, Comelli A, Giuliano M, Madon E et al. Prospective comparative study of bone marrow transplantation and post-remission chemotherapy for childhood acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1046–1054.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tiedemann K, Waters KD, Tauro GP, Tucker D, Ekert H . Results of intensive therapy in childhood acute myeloid leukemia, incorporating high-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation in first complete remission. Blood 1993; 82: 3730–3738.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lehrnbecher T, Varwig D, Kaiser J, Reinhardt D, Klingebiel T, Creutzig U . Infectious complications in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of the prospective multi-institutional clinical trial AML-BFM 93. Leukemia 2004; 18: 72–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ravindranath Y, Yeager AM, Chang MN, Steuber CP, Krischer J, Graham-Pole J, et al., for the Pediatric Oncology Group. Autologous bone marrow transplantation versus intensive consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in childhood. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1428–1434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Creutzig U, Reinhardt D . Current controversies: which patients with acute myeloid leukaemia should receive a bone marrow transplantation? – a European view. Br J Haematol 2002; 118: 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen AR, Alonzo TA, Woods WG, Arceci RJ . Current controversies: which patients with acute myeloid leukaemia should receive a bone marrow transplantation? – an American view. Br J Haematol 2002; 118: 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stevens RF, Hann IM, Wheatley K, Gray RG, on behalf of the MRC Childhood Leukaemia Working Party. Marked improvements in outcome with chemotherapy alone in paediatric acute myeloid leukemia: results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council's 10th AML trial. Br J Haematol 1998; 101: 130–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sievers EL, Lange BJ, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, Bernstein ID, Smith FO et al. Immunophenotypic evidence of leukemia after induction therapy predicts relapse: results from a prospective Children's Cancer Group study of 252 acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood 2002; 101: 3398–3406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Feller N, Van der Pol MA, Van Stijn A, Weijers GW, Westra AH, Evertse BW et al. MRD parameters using immunophenotypic detection methods are highly reliable in predicting survival in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 2004; 18: 1380–1390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zwaan ChM, Meshinchi S, Radich JP, Veerman AJP, Huismans DR, Munske L et al. FLT3 internal tandem duplication in 234 children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): prognostic significance and relation to cellular drug resistance. Blood 2003; 102: 2387–2394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. George B, Mathews V, Poonkuzhali B, Shaji RV, Srivastava A, Chandy M . Treatment of children with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia with arsenic trioxide: a single center experience. Leukemia 2004; 18: 1587–1590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ravindranath Y . Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: the paradox of increased risk for leukemia and heightened sensitivity to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3385–3387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zwaan ChM, Reinhardt D, Corbacioglu S, Van Wering ER, Bökkerink JP, Tissing WJ et al. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin: first clinical experiences in children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated on compassionate use basis. Blood 2003; 101: 3868–3871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Appelbaum FR . New targets for therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2003; 17: 492–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all physicians and hospitals for participating in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Study Group AML studies, as well as the technicians and staff from the DCOG central laboratory and data management office. Statistical advice and support was given by R Brand (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C M Zwaan.

Additional information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Leukemia website (http://www.nature.com/leu).

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kardos, G., Zwaan, C., Kaspers, G. et al. Treatment strategy and results in children treated on three Dutch Childhood Oncology Group acute myeloid leukemia trials. Leukemia 19, 2063–2071 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403873

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403873

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links