JEM-1, a novel nuclear co-factor: localisation and functional interaction with AP-1

Abstract

JEM-1 is a novel gene whose mRNA expression in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is induced by retinoid treatments. The gene product, a 45 kDa basic nuclear factor containing a leucine repeat, was transiently expressed in HeLa or COS-7 cells and immunocharacterized within the nuclei in fine punctuated structures which increase in size after cell transfection. Jem-1 was not expressed in the nucleoli. Experimental deletion of peptide domains of Jem-1 (JemΔ_331–400 and Jem ΔL_179–206) showed that its C-terminal sequence (Thr₃₃₁ → Leu₄₀₀) is required for nuclear translocation, while the leucine repeat domain (Arg₁₇₉ → Glu₂₀₆) has no influence on subcellular localization. The Jem-1 protein was not detected in the PML-containing nuclear bodies or in speckled structures containing the splicing factor SC-35. In contrast it was localized in the nucleus in structures containing activator protein-1 (AP-1). DNA mobility shift assays showed that the in vitro translated Jem protein interacts neither with the DNA binding site of AP-1, nor directly with in vitro co-translated c-Fos or/and c-Jun proteins bound to this specific sequence. Interestingly, Jem-1-1 increased substantially the transcriptional activity of c-Jun (three-fold) and more strongly that of ectopically co-expressed c-Fos and c-Jun (five- to six-fold), as measured by a CAT reporter gene driven by a heterologous promoter containing the AP-1 binding site of the human collagenase gene. These synergistic effects were strongly Jem-1 dose-dependent. However, Jem-1 alone showed no activity on the collagenase promoter. A deletion of the leucine repeat of Jem-1 (Arg₁₇₉ → Glu₂₀₆) did not diminish the enhancer capacity of Jem-1 on AP-1 activity. In contrast, the enhanced AP-1 activity was abrogated when Jem-1 was deleted of its C-terminus (Thr₃₃₁ → Leu₄₀₀). We conclude that the 45 kDa nuclear product of the JEM-1 gene has features of a novel transcription cofactor, which is enhancing AP-1 activity without directly interacting with c-Jun or c-Fos proteins. Possible implications of these findings for APL cell maturation are discussed.