Abstract
Covert attention, the selective processing of visual information at a given location in the absence of eye movements, improves performance in several tasks, such as visual search and detection of luminance and vernier targets1,2,3,4,5,6. An important unsettled issue is whether this improvement is due to a reduction in noise (internal or external)6,7,8,9, a change in decisional criteria10,11, or signal enhancement3,5,12. Here we show that attention can affect performance by signal enhancement. For a texture segregation task in which performance is actually diminished when spatial resolution is too high, we observed that attention improved performance at peripheral locations where spatial resolution was too low, but impaired performance at central locations where spatial resolution was too high4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. The counterintuitive impairment of performance that we found at the central retinal locations appears to have only one possible explanation: attention enhances spatial resolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The spatial extent of focused attention modulates attentional disengagement
Psychological Research Open Access 20 October 2022
-
Spatial attention in encoding letter combinations
Scientific Reports Open Access 17 December 2021
-
Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex
Scientific Reports Open Access 04 December 2020
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
£199.00
only £3.90 per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.



References
Carrasco, M. & Yeshurun, Y. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 673–692 (1998).
Nakayama, K. & Mackeben, M. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Res. 29, 1631–1646 (1989).
Posner, M. I. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32, 3–25 (1980).
Balz, G. W. & Hock, H. S. The effect of attentional spread on spatial resolution. Vision Res. 37, 1499–1510 (1997).
Yeshurun, Y. & Carrasco, M. Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Res. 39, 293–305 (1999).
Morgan, M. J., Ward, R. M. & Castet, E. Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 51A, 343–370 (1998).
Palmer, J. Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Res. 34, 1703–1721 (1994).
Sperling, G. & Dosher, B. A. in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance(eds Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P.) Vol. 1,Ch. 2, 1–65 (Wiley, New York, (1986)).
Graham, N. Visual Pattern Analyzers(Oxford University Press, NY, (1989)).
Kinchla, R. A. Attention. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 43, 711–742 (1992).
Shaw, M. L. in Attention and Performance X(eds Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G.) 109–120 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, (1984)).
Lu, Z. L. & Dosher, B. A. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Res. 38, 1183–1198 (1998).
Jonides, J. in Attention and Performance IX(eds Long, J. B. & Baddeley, A. D.) 187–204 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NI, (1981)).
Carrasco, M. & Frieder, K. S. Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Visual Res. 37, 63–82 (1997).
Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 578–588 (1992).
Wolfe, J. M. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psych. Bull. Rev. 1, 202–238 (1994).
DeValois, R. L. & DeValois, K. K. Spatial Vision(Oxford University, New York, (1988)).
Gurnsey, R., Pearson, P. & Day, D. Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 738–757 (1996).
Joffe, K. M. & Scialfa, C. T. Texture segmentation as a function of eccentricity, spatial frequency and target size. Spatial Vis. 9, 325–342 (1995).
Kehrer, L. Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. Spatial Vis. 4, 45–62 (1989).
Morikawa, K. Peripheral advantage in texture segmentation: the role of spatial and temporal factors. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38 (suppl.), 2986 (1997).
Julesz, B. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature 290, 91–97 (1981).
Cheal, M. L. & Lyon, D. R. Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination. Acta Psychol. 81, 243–267 (1992).
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M. & Nakayama, K. Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task. Nature 387, 805–807 (1997).
Lee, D. K., Koch, C. & Braun, J. Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention. Vision Res. 37, 2409–2418 (1997).
Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).
Luck, S. J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S. A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 24–42 (1997).
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).
Motter, B. M. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 909–919 (1993).
Treue, S. & Maunsell, J. H. R. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature 382, 539–541 (1996).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by an NSF National Young Investigator Grant to M.C. and a Katzell Summer Fellowship to Y.Y. We thank K. Adolph, L. Cameron, J. Fernández, K. Frieder, P.Glimcher, M. Landy, L. Maloney, B. McElree, D. Pelli, E. Phelps and S. Wolfson for their comments on a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeshurun, Y., Carrasco, M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature 396, 72–75 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/23936
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/23936
This article is cited by
-
The spatial extent of focused attention modulates attentional disengagement
Psychological Research (2022)
-
Spatial attention in encoding letter combinations
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-weeds interaction in cropping and unmanaged ecosystems: a review
Symbiosis (2021)
-
Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Attention amplifies neural representations of changes in sensory input at the expense of perceptual accuracy
Nature Communications (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.