Abstract
Metapopulation biology is concerned with the dynamic consequences of migration among local populations and the conditions of regional persistence of species with unstable local populations. Well established effects of habitat patch area and isolation on migration, colonization and population extinction have now become integrated with classic metapopulation dynamics. This has led to models that can be used to predict the movement patterns of individuals, the dynamics of species, and the distributional patterns in multispecies communities in real fragmented landscapes.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
220,50 €
only 4,32 € per issue
All prices include VAT for France.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1.
Nicholson, A. J. The balance of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2, 132–178 (1933).
- 2.
Andrewartha, H. G.& Birch, L. C. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1954)).
- 3.
Wright, S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159 (1931).
- 4.
Wright, S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc. Sixth Int. Congr. Genet. 1, 356–366 (1932).
- 5.
Hanski, I.& Gilpin, M. E. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution(Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 6.
Tilman, D.& Kareiva, P. Spatial Ecology(Princeton University Press, Princeton, (1997)).
- 7.
Bascompte, J.& Solé, R. V. Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology(Springer, New York, (1998)).
- 8.
Durrett, R.& Levin, S. A. Stochastic spatial models: a user's guide to ecological applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 329–350 (1994).
- 9.
Forman, R. T. T. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 10, 133–142 (1995).
- 10.
Wiens, J. A.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 43–68 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 11.
Kareiva, P.& Wennergren, U. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373, 299–302 (1995).
- 12.
Wilson, H. B.et al. in Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology(eds Bascompte, J. & Solé, R. V.) 63–82 (Springer, New York, (1998)).
- 13.
Nee, S., May, R. M.& Hassell, M. P.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 123–148 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 14.
Harrison, S.in Large-scale Ecology and Conservation Biology(eds Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. & Webb, N. R.) 111–128 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, (1994)).
- 15.
Settele, J. Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes(Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1996)).
- 16.
McCullough, D. L. Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation(Island, Washington DC, (1997)).
- 17.
Levins, R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237–240 (1969).
- 18.
Anderson, R. M.& May, R. M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control(Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1991)).
- 19.
Grenfell, B.& Harwood, J. (Meta)population dynamics of infectious diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 395–404 (1997).
- 20.
Bartlett, M. S. Measles periodicity and community size. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 120, 48–70 (1957).
- 21.
Hanski, I. Metapopulation Ecology(Oxford University Press, Oxford, in the press).
- 22.
Hanski, I. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42, 17–38 (1991).
- 23.
Gyllenberg, M., Hanski, I.& Hastings, A.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 93–122 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 24.
Hanski, I. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 131–135 (1994).
- 25.
Hanski, I.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 69–92 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 26.
Hanski, I., Moilanen, A.& Gyllenberg, M. Minimum viable metapopulation size. Am. Nat. 147, 527–541 (1996).
- 27.
Chesson, P.in Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology(eds Bascompte, J. & Solé, R. V.) 151–166 (Springer, New York, (1998)).
- 28.
Thomas, C. D.& Hanski, I.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 359–386 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 29.
Saccheri, I. J.et al. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392, 491–494 (1998).
- 30.
Lande, R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241, 1455–1460 (1988).
- 31.
Lande, R. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 142, 911–927 (1993).
- 32.
Foley, P. Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity. Cons. Biol. 8, 124–137 (1994).
- 33.
Royama, T. Analytical Population Dynamics(Chapman & Hall, London, (1992)).
- 34.
Turchin, P.in Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis(eds Cappuccino, N. & Price, P.) 19–40 (Academic, London, (1995)).
- 35.
den Boer, P. J. Seeing the tree for the wood: random walks or bounded fluctuations of population size? Oecologia 86, 484–491 (1991).
- 36.
Tilman, D.et al. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66 (1994).
- 37.
Hastings, A.& Harrison, S. Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 167–188 (1994).
- 38.
Hassell, M. P., Comins, H. N.& May, R. M. Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics. Nature 370, 290–292 (1994).
- 39.
Barton, N. H.& Whitlock, M. C.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 183–214 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 40.
Hedrick, P. W.& Gilpin, M. E.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 166–182 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 41.
Olivieri, I.& Gouyon, P.-H.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 293–324 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 42.
Murphy, D. D., Freas, K. S.& Weiss, S. B. An environment-metapopulation approach to the conservation of an endangered invertebrate. Cons. Biol. 4, 41–51 (1990).
- 43.
Coyne, J. A., Barton, N. H.& Turelli, M. Acritique of Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51, 643–671 (1997).
- 44.
Leimar, O.& Nordberg, U. Metapopulation extinction and genetic variation in dispersal-related traits. Oikos 80, 448–458 (1997).
- 45.
Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A.& Hanski, I. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273, 1536–1538 (1996).
- 46.
Ims, R. A.& Yoccoz, N. G.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 247–266 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 47.
Turchin, P. Quantitative Analysis of Movement: Measuring and Modelling Population Redistribution in Animals and Plants(Sinaur, Sunderland, MA, (1998)).
- 48.
Hanski, I. Apractical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 151–162 (1994).
- 49.
ter Braak, J. F., Hanski, I. A.& Verboom, J.in Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology(eds Bascompte, J. & Solé, R. V.) 167–188 (Springer, New York, (1998)).
- 50.
Moilanen, A. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation with implicit statistical inference. Ecology(in the press).
- 51.
Moilanen, A., Smith, A. T.& Hanski, I. A. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. Am. Nat. 152, 530–542 (1998).
- 52.
Hanski, I. Inferences from ecological incidence functions. Am. Nat. 139, 657–662 (1992).
- 53.
Pacala, S. W.& Levin, S. A.in Spatial Ecology(eds Tilman, D. & Kareiva, P.) 204–232 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, (1997)).
- 54.
Cain, M. L.et al. Neighbourhood models of clonal growth in the white glover Trifolium repens. Am. Nat. 145, 888–917 (1995).
- 55.
Turchin, P.et al. in Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology(eds Bascompte, J. & Solé, R. V.) 199–213 (Springer, New York, (1998)).
- 56.
Maron, J. L.& Harrison, S. Spatial pattern formation in an insect host-parasitoid system. Science 278, 1619–1621 (1998).
- 57.
Hanski, I.& Gyllenberg, M. Two general metapopulation models and the core-satellite species hypothesis. Am. Nat. 142, 17–41 (1993).
- 58.
Temple, S. A. The problem of avian extinctions. Curr. Ornithol. 3, 453–485 (1986).
- 59.
Akçakaya, H. R.& Ferson, S. RAMAS/Space User Manual: Spatially Structured Population Models for Conservation Biology(Applied Biomathematics, New York, (1992)).
- 60.
Possingham, H. P.& Noble, I. R.in Research Consultancy for the Research Assessment Commission, Forest and Timber Inquiry(Canberra, (1991)).
- 61.
Sjögren-Gulve, P.& Ray, C.in Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation(ed McCullough, D. R.) 111–138 (Island, Washington DC, (1997)).
- 62.
Andrén, H.in Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes(eds Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G.) 225–255 (Chapman & Hall, London, (1995)).
- 63.
Nee, S. & May, R. M. Dynamics of metapopulations: Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40 (1992).
- 64.
Caswell, H.& Cohen, J. E. Disturbance, interspecific interaction and diversity in metapopulations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42, 193–218 (1991).
- 65.
Holt, R. D.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 149–165 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 66.
Hanski, I.& Gyllenberg, M. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science 275, 397–400 (1997).
- 67.
MacArthur, R. H.& Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography(Princeton University Press, Princeton, (1967)).
- 68.
Lawton, J. H. Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 409–413 (1993).
- 69.
Moilanen, A.& Hanski, I. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79, 2503–2515 (1998).
- 70.
Hanski, I.& Simberloff, D.in Metapopulation Biology(eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E.) 5–26 (Academic, San Diego, (1997)).
- 71.
Thomas, C. D.in Aspects of the Genesis and Maintenance of Biological Diversity(eds Hochberg, M. E., Clobert, J. & Barbault, R.) 292–307 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1996)).
- 72.
Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P.& Day, J. R. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol. Cons. 80, 207–219 (1997).
- 73.
With, K. A., Gardner, R. H.& Turner, M. G. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos 78, 151–169 (1997).
- 74.
Weiss, S. J., Murphy, D. D.& White, R. R. Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality in Euphydryas editha. Ecology 69, 1486–1496 (1988).
- 75.
Kindvall, O. The impact of extreme weather on habitat preference and survival in a metapopulation of the bush cricket Metrioptera bicolor in Sweden. Biol. Cons. 73, 51–58 (1995).
- 76.
Doak, D. F.& Mills, L. S. Auseful role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75, 615–626 (1994).
- 77.
Gyllenberg, M.& Hanski, I. Habitat deterioration, habitat destruction and metapopulation persistence in a heterogeneous landscape. Theor. Pop. Biol. 52, 198–215 (1997).
- 78.
Hanski, I.et al. Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics. Nature 377, 618–621 (1995).
Acknowledgements
I thank S. Harrison, M. Hassell, T. Ives, J. Lawton, A. Moilanen, S. van Nouhuys, B. O'Hara, A. Ruina, I. Saccheri, M. Singer, C. Thomas, P. Turchin and N. Wahlberg for comments on the manuscript, and J. Verboom and A. Smith for supplying the nuthatch and pika data for Fig. 3. My metapopulation research has been supported by the Academy of Finland.
Author information
Affiliations
Ilkka Hanski is in the Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Population Biology, PO Box 17 (Arkadiankatu 7), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
- Ilkka Hanski
Authors
Search for Ilkka Hanski in:
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading
-
1.
Stability analysis of a two-patch predator–prey model with two dispersal delays
Advances in Difference Equations (2018)
-
2.
Characterizing the dynamics underlying global spread of epidemics
Nature Communications (2018)
-
3.
Critical regimes driven by recurrent mobility patterns of reaction–diffusion processes in networks
Nature Physics (2018)
-
4.
Asymmetric migration decreases stability but increases resilience in a heterogeneous metapopulation
Nature Communications (2018)
-
5.
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.