Letter | Published:

Biological Sciences: Morphine Physical Dependence unaltered by Previous Dependence on Morphine

Abstract

AFTER a period of abstinence, narcotic addicts, if untreated with opioids, frequently relapse and resume self-administration of opioid compounds1. Little is known about factors that influence relapse; it has been attributed to the addict's social environment and to his or her psychological need for the drug. An alternative possibility is that, because of previous exposure to opioids, post-addicts are biochemically more susceptible to the properties of opioids that produce physical dependence. Opioid compounds have long-term effects on the brain. Bound morphine persists in the rat brain for at least three weeks after a single dose2. Tolerance to morphine was observed 1 year after a single dose of morphine to rats3 and evidence has been presented for an immunological theory of morphine tolerance4. In man5 and rats6 homeostatic disturbances resembling abstinence signs can be detected six months after the acute phase of withdrawal. By contrast with the reported chronic and persistent effects of morphine, Cheney and Goldstein7 have recently shown that the median effective dose of naloxone for precipitating withdrawal-jumping in morphine-dependent mice was unchanged by earlier dependence on morphine. As the evidence for long-term effects of morphine was obtained principally in rats, we have further studied morphine dependence in this animal to determine if previous exposure to morphine permanently alters the neural substrates for producing physical dependence on morphine.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Hunt, G. H., and Odoroff, M. E., Public Health Reports, 77, 41 (1962).

  2. 2

    Misra, A. L., Mitchell, C. L., and Woods, L. A., Nature, 232, 48 (1971).

  3. 3

    Cochin, J., and Kornetsky, C., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 145, 1 (1964).

  4. 4

    Cochin, J., and Kornetsky, C., Res. Pub. Assoc. Nerv. Ment. Disord., 46, 268 (1967).

  5. 5

    Himmelsbach, C. K., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 73, 91 (1941).

  6. 6

    Martin, W. R., Wikler, A., Eades, C. G., and Pescor, F. T., Psychopharmacologia, 4, 247 (1963).

  7. 7

    Cheney, D. L., and Goldstein, A., Nature, 232, 477 (1971).

  8. 8

    Gibson, R. D., and Tingstad, J. E., J. Pharmaceut. Sci., 59, 426 (1970).

  9. 9

    Way, E. L., Loh, H. H., and Shen, F. H., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 167, 1 (1969).

  10. 10

    Martin, W. R., Pharmacol. Rev., 19, 464 (1967).

  11. 11

    Goode, P. G., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 41, 558 (1971).

  12. 12

    Siegel, S., Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 116 (McGraw-Hill, Toronto, 1956).

  13. 13

    Wikler, A., Pescor, F. T., Miller, D., and Norell, H., Psychopharmacologia, 20, 103 (1971).

  14. 14

    Wei, E., Loh, H. H. and Way, E. L., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.