Scientific Correspondence | Published:

Prelude or requiem for the ‘Mozart effect’?

Naturevolume 400pages826827 (1999) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Rauscher et al.1 reported that listening to ten minutes of Mozart's music increased the abstract reasoning ability of college students, as measured by IQ scores, by 8 or 9 points compared with listening to relaxation instructions or silence, respectively1. This startling finding became known as the ‘Mozart effect’, and has since been explored by several research groups. Here I use a meta-analysis to demonstrate that any cognitive enhancement is small and does not reflect any change in IQ or reasoning ability in general, but instead derives entirely from performance on one specific type of cognitive task and has a simple neuropsychological explanation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L. & Ky, K. N. Nature 365, 611 (1993).

  2. 2

    Rosenthal, R. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (Sage, Newbury Park, 1991).

  3. 3

    Rauscher, F. H. & Shaw, G. L. Percept. Motor Skills 86, 835–841 (1998).

  4. 4

    Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L. & Ky, K. N. Neurosci. Lett. 185, 44–47 (1995).

  5. 5

    Ditunno, P. L. & Mann, V. A. Cortex 26, 177–188 (1990).

  6. 6

    Heller, W. & Nitschke, J. B. Cogn. Emot. 11, 637–661 (1997).

  7. 7

    Robertson, I. H., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C. & Driver, J. Nature 395, 169–172 (1998).

  8. 8

    Nantais, K. M. & Schellenbergg, E. G. Psychol. Sci. 10, 370–373 (1999).

  9. 9

    Hallam, S. Psychol. Music (submitted).

  10. 10

    Steele, K. M., Bass, K. E. & Crook, M. D. Psychol. Sci. 10, 366–369 (1999).

  11. 11

    Newman, J. et al. Percept. Motor Skills 81, 1379–1387 (1995).

  12. 12

    Stough, C., Kerkin, B., Bates, T. & Mangan, G. Personal. Individ. Diff. 17, 695 (1994).

  13. 13

    Kenealy, P. & Monsef, A. Psychologist 7, 346 (1994).

  14. 14

    Steele, K. M. et al. Nature 400, 827 (1999).

  15. 15

    Steele, K. M., Ball, T. N. & Runk, R. Percept. Motor Skills 84, 1179–1184 (1997).

  16. 16

    Steele, K. M., Brown, J. D. & Stoecker, J. A. Percept. Motor Skills 88, 843–848 (1999).

  17. 17

    Carstens, C. B. & De Fruscio, D. M. Percept. Motor Skills (submitted).

  18. 18

    Carstens, C. B., Huskins, E. H. & Hounshell, G. W. Psychol. Rep. 77, 111–114 (1995).

  19. 19

    Wilson, T. L. & Brown, T. L. J. Psychol. 131, 365–370 (1997).

  20. 20

    Rideout, B. E. & Laubach, C. M. Percept. Motor Skills 82, 427–432 (1996).

  21. 21

    Rideout, B. E. & Taylor, J. Percept. Motor Skills 85, 112–114 (1997).

  22. 22

    Rideout, B. E., Dougherty, S. & Wernert, L. Percept. Motor Skills 86, 512–514 (1998).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    • Christopher F. Chabris

Authors

  1. Search for Christopher F. Chabris in:

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/23608

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.