Prelude or requiem for the ‘Mozart effect’?

Abstract

Rauscher et al.1 reported that listening to ten minutes of Mozart's music increased the abstract reasoning ability of college students, as measured by IQ scores, by 8 or 9 points compared with listening to relaxation instructions or silence, respectively1. This startling finding became known as the ‘Mozart effect’, and has since been explored by several research groups. Here I use a meta-analysis to demonstrate that any cognitive enhancement is small and does not reflect any change in IQ or reasoning ability in general, but instead derives entirely from performance on one specific type of cognitive task and has a simple neuropsychological explanation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L. & Ky, K. N. Nature 365, 611 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Rosenthal, R. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (Sage, Newbury Park, 1991).

  3. 3

    Rauscher, F. H. & Shaw, G. L. Percept. Motor Skills 86, 835–841 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L. & Ky, K. N. Neurosci. Lett. 185, 44–47 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Ditunno, P. L. & Mann, V. A. Cortex 26, 177–188 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Heller, W. & Nitschke, J. B. Cogn. Emot. 11, 637–661 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Robertson, I. H., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C. & Driver, J. Nature 395, 169–172 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nantais, K. M. & Schellenbergg, E. G. Psychol. Sci. 10, 370–373 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hallam, S. Psychol. Music (submitted).

  10. 10

    Steele, K. M., Bass, K. E. & Crook, M. D. Psychol. Sci. 10, 366–369 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Newman, J. et al. Percept. Motor Skills 81, 1379–1387 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Stough, C., Kerkin, B., Bates, T. & Mangan, G. Personal. Individ. Diff. 17, 695 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Kenealy, P. & Monsef, A. Psychologist 7, 346 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Steele, K. M. et al. Nature 400, 827 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Steele, K. M., Ball, T. N. & Runk, R. Percept. Motor Skills 84, 1179–1184 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Steele, K. M., Brown, J. D. & Stoecker, J. A. Percept. Motor Skills 88, 843–848 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Carstens, C. B. & De Fruscio, D. M. Percept. Motor Skills (submitted).

  18. 18

    Carstens, C. B., Huskins, E. H. & Hounshell, G. W. Psychol. Rep. 77, 111–114 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Wilson, T. L. & Brown, T. L. J. Psychol. 131, 365–370 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Rideout, B. E. & Laubach, C. M. Percept. Motor Skills 82, 427–432 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Rideout, B. E. & Taylor, J. Percept. Motor Skills 85, 112–114 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Rideout, B. E., Dougherty, S. & Wernert, L. Percept. Motor Skills 86, 512–514 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chabris, C. Prelude or requiem for the ‘Mozart effect’?. Nature 400, 826–827 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/23608

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing