Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Stimulation of Partial Limb Regeneration in Rats

Abstract

INJURY1,2, nerves3 and hormones4 have been identified as essential for limb regeneration in amphibia. There seem to be differences in the “current of injury” between regenerating and non-regenerating types of amphibians5; partial limb regeneration can be induced in the latter type by simulating the “current of injury” of the regenerating form6. The cellular process of fracture healing in the amphibian is directly related to the electrical phenomena produced by the fractured bone7 and maximally effective ranges for current density can be determined at the cellular level. This led to the concept of a control system the key element of which was the induction of blastema formation in response to appropriate electrical factors8. The absence of regeneration in the mammal may therefore be due to the absence of adequate electrical factors. We report here the consequences of restoring factors which seem to be of practical as well as theoretical interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rose, S. M., J. Morphol., 77, 119 (1945).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Polezhayev, L. W., Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 21, 141 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Singer, M., Quant. Rev. Biol., 27, 169 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Connelly, T. G., Tassava, R. A., and Thornton, C. S., J. Morphol., 126, 365 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, R. O., J. Bone Joint Surg., 43-A, 643 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, S. D., Anat. Rec., 158, 89 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker, R. O., and Murray, D. G., Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 73, 169 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, R. O., Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. (in the press).

  9. Studitsky, A. N., Zheneuskaya, R. P., and Rumyantseva, O. N., Cesk. Morfol., 4, 331 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson, B. M., J. Morphol., 215, 447 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlson, B. M., Amer. J. Anat., 128, 21 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Betz, E. H., Firket, H., and Reznik, M., Intern. Rev. Cytol., 19, 203 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nicholas, J. S., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 23, 436 (1925–26).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizell, M., Science, 161, 283 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BECKER, R. Stimulation of Partial Limb Regeneration in Rats. Nature 235, 109–111 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/235109a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/235109a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing