Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems

Nature volume 400, pages 664–667 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Vascular plants vary in size by about twelve orders of magnitude, and a single individual sequoia spans nearly this entire range as it grows from a seedling to a mature tree. Size influences nearly all of the structural, functional and ecological characteristics of organisms1,2. Here we present an integrated model for the hydrodynamics, biomechanics and branching geometry of plants, based on the application of a general theory of resource distribution through hierarchical branching networks3 to the case of vascular plants. The model successfully predicts a fractal-like architecture and many known scaling laws, both between and within individual plants, including allometric exponents which are simple multiples of 1/4. We show that conducting tubes must taper and, consequently, that the resistance and fluid flow per tube are independent of the total path length and plant size. This resolves the problem of resistance increasing with length, thereby allowing plants to evolve vertical architectures and explaining why the maximum height of trees is about 100 m. It also explains why the energy use of plants in ecosystems is size independent.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Branching structure.
Figure 2: Effect of sequentially removing branches of increasing radius, r k, on the proportion of total resistance remaining, R k.

References

  1. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Niklas, K. J. Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. Ageneral model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276, 122– 126 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zimmermann, M. H. Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap (Springer, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Tyree, M. T. & Ewers, F. W. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol. 119, 345–360 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K. & Kira, T. Aquantitative analysis of plant form — the pipe model theory: I. Basic analysis. Jpn. J. Ecol. 14, 97–105 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertram, J. E. A. Size-dependent differential scaling in branches: the mechanical design of trees revisited. Trees 4, 241– 253 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patino, S., Tyree, M. T. & Herre, E. A. Comparison of hydraulic architecture of woody plants of differing phylogeny and growth form with special reference to free standing and hemi-epiphytic Ficus species from Panama. New Phytol. 129, 125–134 ( 1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuuluvainen, T., Sprugel, D. G. & Brooks, J. R. Hydraulic architecture and structure of Abies lasiocarpa seedlings in three alpine meadows of different moisture status in the eastern Olympic mountains, Washington, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res. 28, 60–64 ( 1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, S. & Tyree, M. T. Hydraulic architecture of Acer saccharum and A. rubrum : comparison of branches to whole trees and the contribution of leaves to hydraulic resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 45, 179–186 ( 1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ewers, F. W. & Zimmermann, M. H. The hydraulic architecture of eastern hemlock Tsuga canadensis. Can. J. Bot. 62, 940–946 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, S. & Tyree, M. T. Hydraulic resistance in Acer saccharum shoots and its influence on leaf water potential and transpiration. Tree Physiol. 12, 231– 242 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Long, J. N., Smith, F. W. & Scott, D. R. M. The role of Douglas fir stem sapwood and heartwood in the mechanical and physiological support of crowns and development of stem form. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 459– 464 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers, R. & Hinckley, T. M. Foliar weight and area related to current sapwood area in oak. Forest Sci. 25, 298–303 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niklas, K. J. Size-dependent allometry of tree height, diameter and trunk taper. Ann. Bot. 75, 217–227 ( 1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyree, M. T. & Alexander, J. D. Hydraulic conductivity of branch junctions in three temperate tree species. Trees 7, 156–159 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyree, M. T., Graham, M. E. D., Cooper, K. E. & Bazos, L. J. The hydraulic architecture of Thuja occidentalis. Can J. Bot. 61, 2105–2111 ( 1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitter, A. H. & Strickland, T. R. Fractal characterization of root system architecture. Funct. Ecol. 6, 632–635 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morse, D. R., Lawton, J. H., Dodson, J. H. & Williamson, M. M. Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314, 731–733 (1985).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McMahon, T. A. & Kronauer, R. E. Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. J. Theor. Biol. 59, 443–436 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Enquist, B. J., Brown, J. H. & West, G. B. Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density. Nature 395, 163– 165 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turcotte, D. L., Pelletier, J. D. & Newman, W. I. Networks with side branching in biology. J. Theor. Biol. 193, 577–592 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Niklas and M. Tyree for comments. J.H.B. was supported by the NSF, B.J.E. by the NSF and with an NSF post-doctoral fellowship, and G.B.W. by the US Department of Energy. We also thank the Thaw Charitable Trust for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Theoretical Division, T-8, MS B285 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 87545, New Mexico , USA

    Geoffrey B. West

  2. The Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, 87501, New Mexico, USA

    Geoffrey B. West, James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist

  3. Depatment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 87131 , New Mexico, USA

    James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist

Authors
  1. Geoffrey B. West
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James H. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian J. Enquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Enquist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

West, G., Brown, J. & Enquist, B. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems . Nature 400, 664–667 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/23251

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/23251

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing