Abstract
THE embryonic epidermis maintains a two or three cell layer population of undifferentiated cells for several days before about the eleventh day when a sudden burst of proliferation occurs. Although these events immediately precede the initiation of differentiation, an interrelationship between proliferation and differentiation has not been demonstrated. Because of the stimulation, the chick embryo epidermis at days 11–14 is five-fold more active mitotically than the terminal embryonic or post-embryonic chick epidermis1. The same stimulus or stimuli may also be related to the induction of DNA polymerase found during days 10–13 (ref. 2), an event which precedes the increase in DNA synthesis during this period. This increase was verified3 by in vitro experiments in which 2-14C-thymidine was incorporated into the DNA of cultured chick embryo skin. Both the epidermis and dermis of the day 14 embryonic skin show similar stimulation of DNA synthesis compared with synthesis in the day 19 embryonic skin. The study of DNA synthesis in the chick embryo skin is therefore of considerable interest because it encompasses both the stimulatory and inhibitory stages of synthesis. We here report the variation of DNA synthesis in the chick embryonic skin as a function of age (embryonic) as a way of clarifying these events before further investigation of the natural stimulants and inhibitors of DNA synthesis and their influences on the epidermal cell cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rothberg, S., and Ekel, T., Nature, 216, 1352 (1967).
Kischer, C. W., and Furlong, B., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., 124, 1188 (1967).
Kierney, C. E., and Rothberg, S., J. Invest. Dermatol., 53, 351 (1969).
Hamburger, V., and Hamilton, H., J. Morphol., 88, 49 (1951).
Rothberg, S., J. Invest. Dermatol., 49, 35 (1967).
Munro, H. N., and Fleck, A., Meth. Biochem. Analysis, 14, (edit. by Glick, D.) (Wiley, New York, 1966).
Burton, K., Biochem. J., 62, 315 (1956).
Fitton Jackson, S., and Fell, H. B., Develop. Biol., 7, 394 (1963).
Wessells, N. K., Develop. Biol., 3, 355 (1961).
Wessells, N. K., New Engl. J. Med., 277, 21 (1967).
Parakaal, P. F., and Matoltsy, A. G., J. Ultrastruct. Res., 23, 403 (1968).
Pincus, H., J. Invest. Dermatol., 19, 431 (1952).
Brophy, D., and Lobitz, jun., W. C., J. Invest. Dermatol., 32, 495 (1959).
Christophers, E., and Braun-Falco, O., Arch. Klin. Exp. Dermatol., 231, 85 (1967).
Bullough, W. S., and Lawrence, E. B., Exp. Cell Res., 33, 176 (1964).
Bullough, W. S., and Lawrence, E. B., Symp. Zoological Soc. London, No. 12 (edit. by Ebling, F.) (Academic Press, London, 1964).
Baden, H. P., and Sviokla, S., Exp. Cell Res., 50, 644 (1968).
Hennings, H., Elgjo, K., and Iversen, O. H., Virchows Arch., 4, 45 (1969).
Cohen, S., Develop. Biol., 3, 394 (1965).
Hoober, J. K., and Cohen, S., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 138, 347 (1967).
Hoober, J. K., and Cohen, S., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 138, 357 (1967).
Cohen, S., and Stastny, M., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 166, 427 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ROTHBERG, S., EKEL, T. Variation of DNA Synthesis with Age in Chick Embryo Skin. Nature 229, 341–342 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/229341a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/229341a0
This article is cited by
-
Influence of nutritional factors on chick epidermal differentiation
Experientia (1972)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.