In the field of symbolic logic at least, fundamental discoveries seem to follow patterns, suggesting that future discoveries may in some sense be predictable.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Harmon, G. thesis, Case Western Reserve (1969).
Feller, W., An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, 1, (John Wiley, New York, 1950).
Church, A., J. Symbolic Logic, 1, 121 (1936); 3, 178 (1938).
Goffman, W., Nature, 212, 449 (1966).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GOFFMAN, W., HARMON, G. Mathematical Approach to the Prediction of Scientific Discovery. Nature 229, 103–104 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/229103a0
This article is cited by
Input–output analysis of international research collaborations: a case study of five U.S. universities
Analyzing concept complexity, knowledge ageing and diffusion pattern of Mooc
A few special cases: scientific creativity and network dynamics in the field of rare diseases
Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas
Growth cycles of knowledge
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.