Letter | Published:

A Paradox in the Interaction of the Gravitational and Electromagnetic Fields ?

Abstract

RECENTLY Woodward and Yourgrau1 put forward the hypothesis that the influence of gravitation on the propagation of electromagnetic waves depends on the frequency of the radiation. Their starting point is that the light deflexion by the Sun's gravitational field, as found from optical determinations at solar eclipses, appears somewhat larger2,3 than the value predicted by Einstein's theory of gravitation. Lately Muhleman et al.4 and Seielstad et al.5 succeeded in measuring the light deflexion by the Sun at 2.388 GHz and 9.602 GHz. Their results (1.82″ ± 0.2″ and 1.77″ ± 0.2 ″) are in close agreement with the predictions of general relativity. The uncertainty introduced by our limited knowledge of the coronal plasma amounts to about 10 per cent of the relativistic light deflexion4, which, being sufficient to prevent a decision between Einstein's theory and the Brans-Dicke theory, is not enough to make these measurements compatible with the predictions of Woodward and Yourgrau. Their hypothesis (according to formula (2), or (1) and (3))1 gives at 2.388 GHz and 9.602 GHz the tremendous values of 15′ 39″ and 7′ 45″ respectively for the light deflexion (that is, more than 500 times and 200 times the experimental results).

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Woodward, J. F., and Yourgrau, W., Nature, 226, 619 (1970).

  2. 2

    Mikhailov, A. A., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 119, 593 (1959).

  3. 3

    Klüber, H. von, Vistas in Astronomy, 3, 47 (New York, 1960).

  4. 4

    Muhleman, D. O., Ekers, R. D., and Fomalat, E. B., Phys. Rev. Lett., 24, 1377 (1970).

  5. 5

    Seielstad, G. A., Sramek, R. A., and Weiler, K. W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 24, 1373 (1970).

  6. 6

    Sadeh, D., Knowles, S., and Yaplee, B. S., Science, 159, 307 (1968).

  7. 7

    Sadeh, D., Knowles, S., and Au, B., Science, 161, 567 (1968).

  8. 8

    Shapiro, I. I., Pettengill, G. H., Ash, M. E., Stone, M. L., Smith, W. B., Ingalls, R. P., and Brockelman, R. A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 20, 1265 (1968).

  9. 9

    Shapiro, I. I., ESRO Summer School (Interlaken, 1969).

  10. 10

    Anderson, J. D., Muhleman, D. O., and Martin, W., Proc. Thirteenth COSPAR Plenary Meeting (Leningrad, 1970).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.