Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Himalayan Ridge in the Light of the Theory of Continental Drift

Abstract

A UNIQUE feature of the geology of the Himalayas is the presence to the north of the Great Himalayan Range of a complete sequence of marine fossiliferous rocks ranging in age from the Cambrian to Eocene and an enigmatic absence of fossils in the pre-Tertiary sediments lying to the south of the range1. A notable exception is found in Kashmir where fossiliferous Cambrian to Jurassic marine rocks lie to the south of the Great Himalayan Range as a result of the Kashmir Nappe2. Geologists working in the Himalayas have tried to explain this anomaly by erecting a hypothetical barrier between the northern and southern basins to prevent the migration of animals and plants from north to south. This barrier was called by Wadia3 a “geanticline within the main geosyncline”, Pande and Saxena4 thought that the geanticline or central barrier was formed during the Ordovician times. Fuchs5 named this imaginary barrier “Himalayan Ridge” and thought that it was formed after the Caledonian orogeny. It has also been suggested that this geanticline or ridge has been subjected to denudational processes since its origin in the early Palaeozoic times, but it has become the highest mountain range in the world and it is still rising.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burrard, S. G., and Hayden, H. H., Geography and Geology of the Himalayan Mountains and Tibet, 208 (Calcutta, 1907–1908).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wadia, D. N., Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind., 68, Part 2, 123 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wadia, D. N., Geology of India, 420 (Macmillan and Co. Ltd, London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pande, I. C., and Saxena, M. N., Birth and Development of Himalaya 5 (Publication No. 4 of the Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Chandigarh, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs, G., 23rd Int. Geol. Congr., 3, 168 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes, A., Principles of Physical Geology, 1224 (Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wegener, A., The Origin of Continents and Oceans (Methuen, London, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gansser, A., Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 59, No. 2, 842 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JAIN, S., KANWAR, R. Himalayan Ridge in the Light of the Theory of Continental Drift. Nature 227, 829 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/227829a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227829a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing