Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Relativistic Behaviour of Moving Terrestrial Clocks


EINSTEIN concluded in his 1905 paper on relativity that “a balance-clock at the equator must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely similar clock situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions”1. At that time, of course, he had not yet developed the general theory and did not realize that the difference in the gravitational potential at the equator and poles would just cancel the time dilatation from the difference in surface speeds, as has been pointed out recently by W. J. Cocke2. Cocke has also shown that, in so far as the Earth assumes the shape of the geoid (and weak tidal fields can be neglected), its entire surface is an “equal time” surface. There remains an interesting question, however: What would be the rate of a standard clock that is moving relative to stationary standard clocks on the geoid ? The standard answer that moving clocks run slow by the well known factor (1 - v2/c2)1/2 is almost certainly incorrect. The purpose of this note is to discuss this question of the rate of moving terrestrial clocks relative to stationary ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Einstein, A., Ann. Physik, 17, 891 (1905) (English translation by Perrett, W., and Jeffrey, G. B., The Principle of Relativity (Dover Publications, New York, 1923)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cocke, W. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 16, 662 (1966).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Møller, C., The Theory of Relativity (Oxford University Press, 1952).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramsey, N. F., Amer. Sci., 56, 420 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dingle, H., Nature, 217, 19 (1968).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodily, L. N., and Hyatt, L. C., Hewlett-Packard J., 19, 12, No. 4 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HAFELE, J. Relativistic Behaviour of Moving Terrestrial Clocks. Nature 227, 270–271 (1970).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing