Abstract
On the basis of double radioactive labelling and buoyant density studies, it is concluded that “I-DNA” is not a separate entity from nuclear DNA but may be an artefact derived from it.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, E., Nature, 224, 326 (1969).
Fromson, D., and Nemer, M., Science, 168, 266 (1970).
Haley, E. E., Fischer, G. A., and Welch, A. D., Cancer Res., 21, 532 (1961).
Sibatani, A., Anal. Biochem., 33, 279 (1970).
Bollum, F. J., in Procedures in Nucleic Acid Research (edit. by Cantoni G. L. and Davies, D. R.), 284 (Harper and Row, New York, 1966).
Kirby, K. S., and Cook, E. A., Biochem. J., 10, 254 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MÜLLER, W., ZAHN, R. & BEYER, R. Is “I-DNA” derived from Nuclear DNA ?. Nature 227, 1211–1212 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/2271211a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2271211a0
This article is cited by
-
Bleomycin: Action on growth of oncogenic RNA viruses and on cell transformation
Archives of Virology (1975)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.