Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

East Canary Islands as a Microcontinent within the Africa–North America Continental Drift Fit

Abstract

Dash and Bosshard1 have reported, on the basis of seismic reflexion and refraction profiling, that the five western islands of the Canary archipelago lie on normal oceanic crust. On the other hand, Lanzarote Island and Fuerteventura Island and Concepcion Bank (constituting the eastern group) seem to rest on continental or sialic crust. They suggest that a fault lies parallel with and westward of Fuerteventura, eastward of which the sediments on the sea floor are 6 km thick. Rothe and Schmincke2 further support this interpretation by suggesting that the western islands are typical oceanic volcanic cones built from sea-floor vents. In contrast, sedimentary strata in the eastern group show strong geological affinities to mainland Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dash, B. P., and Bosshard, E., Proc. Twenty-third Intern. Geol. Cong., 1, 249 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rothe, P., and Schmincke, H.-U., Nature, 218, 1152 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sproll, W. P., and Dietz, R. S., Nature, 222, 345 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz, R. S., and Sproll, W. P., Science, 167, 1612 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carey, S. W., Continental Drift, A Symposium (edit. by Carey, S. W.), 177 (University of Tasmania, Hobart, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. US Navy BC charts and sounding collection sheets (1:600,000), Nos.206N, 205N, 106N and 107N (US Naval Oceanographic Office, 1952).

  7. Uchupi, E., Continental Margin Bathymetric Charts (1:1,000,000), I-475 (US Geological Survey, 1966).

  8. Charts I-451 (US Geological Survey, 1965).

  9. Chart 801 (Canadian Hydrographic Service of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, 1969).

  10. US Navy BC Charts, Nos. 508 and 608 (US Naval Oceanographic Office, 1965, 1968).

  11. Dietz, R. S., Holden, J. C., and Sproll, W. P., Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. (in the press).

  12. Dietz, R. S., and Holden, J. C., J. Geophys. Res. (in the press).

  13. Rona, P. A., and Nalwalk, A. J., Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. (in the press).

  14. Rothe, P., Geol. Rund., 48, 314 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bullard, E. C., Everett, J. E., and Smith, A. G., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, 258, 41 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DIETZ, R., SPROLL, W. East Canary Islands as a Microcontinent within the Africa–North America Continental Drift Fit. Nature 226, 1043–1045 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/2261043b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2261043b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing