Letter | Published:

Extending the methodology of X-ray crystallography to allow imaging of micrometre-sized non-crystalline specimens

Nature volume 400, pages 342344 (22 July 1999) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The contrast and penetrating power afforded by soft X-rays when they interact with matter makes this form of radiation ideal for studying micrometre-sized objects1,2. But although soft X-rays areuseful for probing detail too fine for visible light microscopy in specimens too thick for electron microscopy, the highest-resolution applications of X-ray imaging have been traditionally limited to crystalline samples. Here we demonstrate imaging (at 75 nm resolution) of a non-crystalline sample, consisting of an array of gold dots, by measuring the soft X-ray diffraction pattern from which an image can be reconstructed. The crystallographic phase problem3 — the usually unavoidable loss of phase information in the diffraction intensity — is overcome by oversampling4 the diffraction pattern, and the image is obtained using an iterative algorithm5. Our X-ray microscopy technique requires no high-resolution X-ray optical elements or detectors. We believe that resolutions of 10–20 nm should be achievable; this would provide an imaging resolution about 100 times lower than that attainable with conventional X-ray crystallography, but our method is applicable to structures roughly 100 times larger. This latter feature may facilitate the imaging of small whole cells or large subcellular structures in cell biology.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Soft X-ray microscopes and their biological applications. Q. Rev. Biophys. 28, 33–130 (1995).

  2. 2.

    & X-ray microscopy. Acta Crystallogr. A 51, 237–252 (1995).

  3. 3.

    Phase retrieval in crystallography and optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 394–411 (1990).

  4. 4.

    Fourier phase problems are uniquely solvable in more than one dimension. I: underlying theory. Optik 61, 247–262 (1982).

  5. 5.

    , & Phase retrieval from the magnitude of the Fourier transforms of non-periodic objects. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1662–1669 (1998).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Potential operating region for ultrasoft X-ray microscopy of biological specimens. Science 196, 1339–1340 (1977).

  7. 7.

    & X-ray microscopy with synchrotron radiation. Nature Struct. Biol. 5, (synchrotron suppl.), 650–653 (1998).

  8. 8.

    , & Resolution in soft X-ray microscopes. Ultramicroscopy 47, 55–79 (1992).

  9. 9.

    , , & (eds) X-ray Microscopy and Spectromicroscopy (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

  10. 10.

    Ultra high resolution x-ray tomography. Science 266, 1213–1215 (1994).

  11. 11.

    3D x-ray microscopy: tomographic imaging of mineral sheaths of bacteria Leptothrix ochracea with the Göttingen x-ray microscope at BESSY. Optik 104, 166–170 (1997).

  12. 12.

    , , & Soft x-ray microscopy with cryo STXM: II. Tomography. J. Microsc.(in the press).

  13. 13.

    X-ray holograms at improved resolution: a study of zymogen granules. Science 238, 514–517 (1987).

  14. 14.

    , , & X-ray holographic microscopy by means of photoresist recording and atomic-force microscope readout. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1788–1800 (1996).

  15. 15.

    in Imaging Processes and Coherence in Physics (eds Schlenker, M. et al.) 229–235 (Springer, Berlin, 1980).

  16. 16.

    , & On the extendibility of X-ray crystallography to noncrystals. Acta Crystallogr. A 54, 233–239 (1998).

  17. 17.

    Phase retrieval algorithm: a comparison. Appl. Opt. 21, 2758–2769 (1982).

  18. 18.

    & in X-ray Microscopy and Spectromicroscopy (eds Thieme, J., Schmahl, G., Rudolph, D. & Umbach, E.) 25–34 (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

  19. 19.

    in X-ray Microscopy and Spectromicroscopy (eds Thieme, J., Schmahl, G., Rudolph, D. & Umbach, E.) 35–44 (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

  20. 20.

    in X-ray Microscopy and Spectromicroscopy (eds Thieme, J., Schmahl, G., Rudolph, D. & Umbach, E.) 75–86 (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The decision to try oversampling as a phasing technique was arrived at in a conversation in the late 1980s with G. Bricogne. W. Yun and H. N. Chapman also participated in early parts of this experiment. We thank C. Jacobsen for help and advice, especially with the numerical reconstruction, and we thank him and M. Howells for use of the apparatus20 in which the exposures were made; we also thank S. Wirick for help with data acquisition. P.C. thanks the Leverhulme Trust Great Britain for supporting the nanofabrication programme at King's College, London. This work was performed at the National Synchrotron Light Source, which is supported by the US Department of Energy. Our work was supported in part by the US Department of Energy.

Author information

Author notes

    • David Sayre

    Present address: 15 Jefferson Court, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807-3050, USA.

Affiliations

  1. *Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-3800, USA

    • Jianwei Miao
    •  & Janos Kirz
  2. †Kings College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK

    • Pambos Charalambous

Authors

  1. Search for Jianwei Miao in:

  2. Search for Pambos Charalambous in:

  3. Search for Janos Kirz in:

  4. Search for David Sayre in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianwei Miao.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/22498

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.