Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quantum Interference Paradox

Abstract

THE development of atomic time standards and high-speed recording techniques has allowed the extension of radio interferometry to baselines extending thousands of miles. The amplitude, rather than the power, of the received radiation is recorded separately at two or more stations with accurate time control, and the interference pattern is later recovered by cross-correlating the signals by digital1,2 or analogue3 methods. The measurements are usually described in classical terms, for the observations are well outside the domain of quantum phenomena. A discussion of the technique in quantum terms, however, raises an interesting form of the quantum interference paradox that Einstein, Bohr and others debated so vigorously4 40 years ago, in the discussion of the two-slit interference pattern shown in Fig. la. Any attempt to determine which slit a photon or an electron passes through must result in the destruction of the interference pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moran, J. M., Crowther, P. P., Burke, B. F., Barrett, A. H., Rogers, A. E. E., Ball, J. A., Carter, J. C., and Bare, C. C., Science, 157, 676 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bare, C. C., Clark, B. G., Kellermann, K. I., Cohen, M., and Jauncey, D. L., Science, 157, 189 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Broten, N. W., Locke, J. L., Legg, T. H., McLeish, R. S., Richards, R. M., Chisholm, R. M., Gush, H. P., Yen, J. L., and Galt, J. A., Science, 156, 1592 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, Bohr, Niels, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, 32 (Science Editions, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Serber, R., and Townes, C. H., Quantum Electronics, (edit. by Townes, C. H.), 233 (Columbia University Press, New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURKE, B. Quantum Interference Paradox. Nature 223, 389–390 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/223389a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/223389a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing