Article | Published:

Statistical Methods in Scientific Inference

Nature volume 222, pages 12331237 (28 June 1969) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Examination of the conflicting statistical methods currently used in scientific inference reveals an increasing awareness of the utility of likelihood. The concept of prior likelihood is introduced as a means of completing a scheme of inference which does not share the logical disadvantages of other methods.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , The Logic of Chance, second ed. (Macmillan, London, 1876).

  2. 2.

    , Theory of Probability, second ed. (Oxford University Press, 1948).

  3. 3.

    , Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 53, 370 (1763) reprinted in Biometrika, 45, 296 (1958).

  4. 4.

    , Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, 222, 309 (1922).

  5. 5.

    , Logic of Statistical Inference (Cambridge University Press, 1965).

  6. 6.

    , Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint (Cambridge University Press, 1965).

  7. 7.

    , A Treatise on Probability (Macmillan, London, 1921).

  8. 8.

    , in Studies in Subjective Probability (Wiley, New York, 1964).

  9. 9.

    , Probability and the Weighing of Evidence (Griffin, London, 1950).

  10. 10.

    , The Estimation of Probabilities (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965).

  11. 11.

    , in The Foundations of Statistical Inference (Methuen, London, 1962).

  12. 12.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B, 23, 1 (1961).

  13. 13.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B, 23, 1 (1961); in discussion.

  14. 14.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B, 30, 205 (1968).

  15. 15.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B, 30, 205 (1968); in discussion.

  16. 16.

    , Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, 2 (Princeton University Press, 1954).

  17. 17.

    , Essays on Probability and Statistics (Methuen, London 1962).

  18. 18.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., A, 130, 457 (1967).

  19. 19.

    , Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1956).

  20. 20.

    , Statistical Methods for Research Workers (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1925).

  21. 21.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B, 11, 115 (1949).

  22. 22.

    , Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. and Probability, 1, 27 (1966).

  23. 23.

    , J. Inst. Actuar., 93, 229 (1967).

  24. 24.

    , J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 57, 269 (1962).

  25. 25.

    , and , Bull. Intern. Statist. Inst., 41, 803 (1966).

  26. 26.

    , Exposition de la Theorie des Chances et des Probabilités (Hachette, Paris, 1843).

  27. 27.

    , Contributions to Mathematical Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1950).

  28. 28.

    , and , Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, 231, 289 (1933). Reprinted in Joint Statistical Papers (Cambridge University Press, 1967).

  29. 29.

    , Sequential Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1947).

  30. 30.

    , and , Applied Statistical Decision Theory (Harvard University, 1961).

  31. 31.

    , J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 57, 269 (1962); in discussion.

  32. 32.

    , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 26, 528 (1930).

  33. 33.

    , Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 144, 285 (1934).

  34. 34.

    , J. Roy. Statist. Soc., 98, 39 (1935).

  35. 35.

    , Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci., 71, 245 (1936).

  36. 36.

    , An Investigation of the Laws of Thought (Walton and Maberly, London, 1854).

  37. 37.

    (1777), reprinted in Biometrika, 48, 3 (1961).

  38. 38.

    , Amer. J. Human. Genet., 11, 289 (1959).

  39. 39.

    , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 32, 416 (1936).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge

    • A. W. F. EDWARDS

Authors

  1. Search for A. W. F. EDWARDS in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/2221233a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.