Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Distinction between a Proximal Negative Response and the Local b Wave in the Retina

Abstract

WHEN light is flashed on the retina, a spatial and temporal pattern of neural activity is produced among several types of retinal cells. The resulting pattern of extracellular voltage can be recorded by placing a microelectrode at various depths within the retina. Recently, most of the graded slow potentials recorded in this way have been identified with components of the intraretinal electroretinogram1–3. In this communication, I conclude that there is another major type of local extracellular slow potential in the frog retina. This potential, referred to here as the proximal negative response (PNR), is most clearly evident in the proximal (anterior) part of the retina4,5. In the past, it has been suggested that the PNR and the electroretinogram (ERG) are fundamentally different in nature4–6. It has never been clearly shown, however, that the PNR can be distinguished from the local, negative intraretinal b wave of the ERG. An alternative hypothesis3,7 that the PNR may simply be the local b wave therefore seems tenable and apparently prevails at present.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Tomita, T. J., Opt. Soc. Amer., 53, 49 (1963).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, K. T., Vision Res., 8, 633 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Granit, R., in The Eye (edit. by Davson, H.), 2, chap. 23 (Academic Press, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tomita, T., and Torihama, Y., Jap. J. Physiol., 6, 118 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gouras, P., Amer. J. Ophthal., 46 (part 2), 59 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brindley, G. S., J. Physiol., 134, 360 (1956); Physiology of the Retina and Visual Pathway (Edward Arnold, London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomita, T., Murakami, M., and Hashimoto, Y., J. Gen. Physiol., 43, (6), part 2, 81 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolbarsht, M. L., MacNichol, jun., E. F., and Wagner, H. G., Science, 132, 1309 (1960).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murakami, M., and Kaneko, A., Vision Res., 6, 627 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byzov, A. L., Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 30, 547 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURKHARDT, D. Distinction between a Proximal Negative Response and the Local b Wave in the Retina. Nature 221, 879–880 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/221879a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/221879a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing