Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sex Pheromone Perception

Abstract

IT is very difficult to define the mechanism by which olfactory receptors on male moth antennae perceive a sex attractant chemical because of the various unsubstantiated olfaction theories, and also because of conflicting reports of the ability of chemicals, structurally different from natural sex attractants, to either inhibit1–5 or mimic6–9 attractant activity. Using the synthetic red-banded leaf roller moth (Argyrotaenia velutinana) sex attractant (RiBLuRe)10, we have been able to obtain evidence that the geometrical isomer inhibits the response of males to the sex attractant chemical, and that varying degrees of inhibition can be elicited with positional isomers, homologues and analogues. The preliminary data support a mechanism of perception in which the sex attractant, a chemical with the correct spatial arrangement of active sites, possesses the affinity and intrinsic activity for the receptor sites to elicit proper behavioural responses, including flight to the location of the sex attractant. Closely related isomers which do not display intrinsic activity by attracting males apparently can possess a strong affinity for the receptor sites, thus acting as inhibitors or modifiers of the sensory input.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eiter, K., Truscheit, E., and Boners, M., Liebigs Ann. Chem., 709, 29 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Water, R. M., and Jacobson, M., J. Econ. Entomol., 58, 370 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobson, M., and Smalls, L. A., J. Econ. Entomol., 59, 414 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K., Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 60, 847 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson, M., and Smalls, L. A., J. Econ. Entomol., 60, 296 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, R. S., and Canerday, T. D., J. Econ. Entomol., 61, 452 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Green, N., Jacobson, M., Henneberry, T. J., and Kishaba, A. N., J. Med. Chem., 10, 533 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobson, M., Toba, H. H., DeBolt, J., and Kishaba, A. N., J. Econ. Entomol., 61, 84 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warthen, D., and Jacobson, M., J. Med. Chem., 11, 373 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roelofs, W. L., and Arn, H., Nature, 219, 513 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson, M., Insect Sex Attractants, 100 (Interscience, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROELOFS, W., COMEAU, A. Sex Pheromone Perception. Nature 220, 600–601 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/220600a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/220600a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing