Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The H–Y Transplantation Antigen: A Y-linked or Sex-influenced Factor?

Abstract

IN mice and rats there is one exception to the rule that grafts are always accepted between members of an isogenic population. This applies when females are challenged with skin and other tissues from male donors1–6. The ability of females to reject these grafts varies from strain to strain. For example, while virtually 100 per cent of C57BL/6 (hereafter C57) females and about 75 per cent of A strain females reject male skin isografts, CBA and AU strain females usually accept such grafts. This interstrain diversity occurs despite the fact that the specificity of the Y antigen or “Y factor” is apparently the same in male mice of all stocks7. The basis for this variability stems from two factors: the first is the genotype of the female which determines her capacity to react against male skin and the second is the genetic background of the male which influences the expression of the Y antigen8. Thus the complete penetrance of the Y factor in C57 mice is due to the females of this strain being relatively strong reactors against male skin isografts, and is not because the antigen is strongest in this strain. Indeed, that the antigen is weaker in C57 males than in CBA males follows from the fact that (CBA × C57)F1 hybrid females reject grafts from CBA males more frequently than from C57 males8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eichwald, E. J., and Silmser, C. H., Transplant. Bull., 2, 148 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eichwald, E. J., Silmser, C. E., and Weissman, I., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 20, 563 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman, M., Transplant. Bull., 5, 15 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sachs, L., and Heller, E., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 20, 555 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gittes, R. F., and Russell, P. S., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 26, 283 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoshino, K., and Moore, J. E., Intern. J. Cancer, 3, 374 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Billingham, R. E., and Silvers, W. K., Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 17, 531 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Silvers, W. K., and Billingham, R. E., Science, 158, 118 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. VojtÍšková, M., and Poláčková, M., Folia Biol. (Prague), 12, 137 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poláčková, M., and VojtÍšková, M., Folia Biol. (Prague), 14, 93 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silvers, W. K., J. Exp. Med., 128, 69 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Billingham, R. E., in Transplantation of Tissues and Cells (edit. by Billingham, R. E., and Silvers, W. K.), 1 (Wistar, Philadelphia, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanford, B. H., Chase, H. B., Carroll, S. B., and Arsenault, C. T., Anat. Rec., 152, 17 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Engelstein, J. M., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 126, 907 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Snell, G. D., and Stimpfling, J. H., in Biology of the Laboratory Mouse (edit. by Green, E. L.), 457 (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SILVERS, W., BILLINGHAM, R. & SANFORD, B. The H–Y Transplantation Antigen: A Y-linked or Sex-influenced Factor?. Nature 220, 401–403 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/220401a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/220401a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing