The H–Y Transplantation Antigen: A Y-linked or Sex-influenced Factor?

Abstract

IN mice and rats there is one exception to the rule that grafts are always accepted between members of an isogenic population. This applies when females are challenged with skin and other tissues from male donors1–6. The ability of females to reject these grafts varies from strain to strain. For example, while virtually 100 per cent of C57BL/6 (hereafter C57) females and about 75 per cent of A strain females reject male skin isografts, CBA and AU strain females usually accept such grafts. This interstrain diversity occurs despite the fact that the specificity of the Y antigen or “Y factor” is apparently the same in male mice of all stocks7. The basis for this variability stems from two factors: the first is the genotype of the female which determines her capacity to react against male skin and the second is the genetic background of the male which influences the expression of the Y antigen8. Thus the complete penetrance of the Y factor in C57 mice is due to the females of this strain being relatively strong reactors against male skin isografts, and is not because the antigen is strongest in this strain. Indeed, that the antigen is weaker in C57 males than in CBA males follows from the fact that (CBA × C57)F1 hybrid females reject grafts from CBA males more frequently than from C57 males8.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Eichwald, E. J., and Silmser, C. H., Transplant. Bull., 2, 148 (1955).

  2. 2

    Eichwald, E. J., Silmser, C. E., and Weissman, I., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 20, 563 (1958).

  3. 3

    Feldman, M., Transplant. Bull., 5, 15 (1958).

  4. 4

    Sachs, L., and Heller, E., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 20, 555 (1958).

  5. 5

    Gittes, R. F., and Russell, P. S., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 26, 283 (1961).

  6. 6

    Hoshino, K., and Moore, J. E., Intern. J. Cancer, 3, 374 (1968).

  7. 7

    Billingham, R. E., and Silvers, W. K., Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 17, 531 (1963).

  8. 8

    Silvers, W. K., and Billingham, R. E., Science, 158, 118 (1967).

  9. 9

    VojtÍšková, M., and Poláčková, M., Folia Biol. (Prague), 12, 137 (1966).

  10. 10

    Poláčková, M., and VojtÍšková, M., Folia Biol. (Prague), 14, 93 (1968).

  11. 11

    Silvers, W. K., J. Exp. Med., 128, 69 (1968).

  12. 12

    Billingham, R. E., in Transplantation of Tissues and Cells (edit. by Billingham, R. E., and Silvers, W. K.), 1 (Wistar, Philadelphia, 1961).

  13. 13

    Sanford, B. H., Chase, H. B., Carroll, S. B., and Arsenault, C. T., Anat. Rec., 152, 17 (1965).

  14. 14

    Engelstein, J. M., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 126, 907 (1967).

  15. 15

    Snell, G. D., and Stimpfling, J. H., in Biology of the Laboratory Mouse (edit. by Green, E. L.), 457 (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1966).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SILVERS, W., BILLINGHAM, R. & SANFORD, B. The H–Y Transplantation Antigen: A Y-linked or Sex-influenced Factor?. Nature 220, 401–403 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/220401a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.