Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Retention of Inhaled Ethyl Iodide labelled with lodine-132

Abstract

RETENTION of methyl iodide labelled with iodine-132 inhaled by human subjects varies between 53 and 92 per cent1–2. Retention is very dependent on the breathing rate of the subject–low rates being associated with high retention and vice versa. Using the same apparatus and iodine-132 labelling techniques, we have now carried out a similar but more limited investigation of the retention of inhaled ethyl iodide by the same volunteers. For a group of seven individuals breathing normally, this varied from 44 to 62 per cent (compared with values ranging from 53 to 81 per cent for methyl iodide for the same individuals). The retention for a particular subject again correlated strongly with his breathing rate, varying from 78 per cent at two breaths/min to 29 per cent at 45 breaths/min.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgan, D. J., Nature, 207, 1310 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan, D. J., and Morgan, A., Studies on the Retention and Metabolism of Inhaled Methyl Iodide, AERE-R5117 (1966).

  3. Blumgart, H., Gilligan, D. R., and Swartz, J. H., J. Clin. Invest., 9, 635 (1930).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MORGAN, D., BLACK, A. & MITCHELL, G. Retention of Inhaled Ethyl Iodide labelled with lodine-132. Nature 218, 1177–1178 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/2181177a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2181177a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing