Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Genetically Controlled Tumour Formation and Vascularization in Tomato

Abstract

SEVERAL effects of gibberellic acid on plant growth and differentiation have been recognized1–4, but there have been no previous reports of any effect on tumorous genotypes in vivo. This communication reports the effect of gibberellic acid on a genetically controlled condition resembling a tumour and on vascular development in a tomato hybrid. The tumour condition appears on the hybrid plants carrying the Frosty spot (Frs) gene from Lycopersicon chilense on the background of L. esculentum variety ‘Tiny Tim’, and is transmitted as a dominant trait5. Tumours consisting of groups of undifferentiated parenchymatous cells develop along the veins of the leaves, after which the affected tissues become chlorotic and necrotic5,6. Plants with a tumour trait appear dwarfed and have poorly developed vascular tissue, which results in weak stems. The non-tumorous plants, however, are normal and show good vascular development. In the tumorous plants, differentiation of vascular tissue stops after three to six layers of secondary xylem have been formed (Fig. 1A). In contrast to this, the derivatives of cambium in the normal genotype are many and show relatively more lignification in the secondary xylem (Fig. 1B).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradley, M. V., and Crane, J. C., Science, 126, 972 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lang, A., 25th Symp. of the Soc. for Devlp. Biol., 251 (1966).

  3. Waisel, Y., Noah, I., and Fahn, A., New Phytologist, 65, 319 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Digby, J., and Wareing, P., Ann. Bot. (N.S.), 30, 539 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, F. W., Ann. Bot., 30, 701 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doering, G. R., and Ahuja, M. R., Planta, 75, 85 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sachs, R. M., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 16, 73 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paleg, L. G., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 16, 291 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clutter, M. E., Science, 132, 548 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs, W. P., Amer. J. Bot., 39, 301 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wetmore, R. H., and Rier, J. P., Amer. J. Bot., 50, 418 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AHUJA, M., DOERING, G. Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Genetically Controlled Tumour Formation and Vascularization in Tomato. Nature 216, 800–801 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216800a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216800a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing