Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The Case Against Special Relativity

Abstract

In 1962 Professor H. Dingle published an argument that the theory of special relativity is invalid. In what follows he restates his case, which is then answered by Professor W. H. McCrea.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dingle, H., Nature, 195, 985 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Born, M., Nature, 197, 1287 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dingle, H., Nature, 197, 1288 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Einstein, A., Ann. d. Phys., 17, 891 (1905). English translation in The Principle of Relativity, by Einstein and others, 49 (Methuen, 1923).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorentz, H. A., Proc. Acad. Sci. Amsterdam, 6, 809 (1904). Reprinted in The Principle of Relativity, by Einstein and others (Methuen, 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Poincaré, H., Dernières Pensées, chap. 7.

  7. Whittaker, E. T., History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, 2, chap. 2 (Nelson, 1953).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritz, W., Ann. Chim. Phys., 13, 145 (1908).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. See preface (p. xx) to Ritz, W., Gesammelte Werke (1911).

  10. Dingle, H., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 119, 67 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alväger, T., Nilsson, A., and Kjellman, J., Nature, 197, 1191 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Einstein, A., Nature, 106, 782 (1921).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dingle, H., The Observatory, 85, 262 (1965); 86, 165 (1966).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dingle, H., Nature, 183, 1761 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DINGLE, H. The Case Against Special Relativity. Nature 216, 119–122 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216119a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216119a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing