Abstract
ACCORDING to several reports, the prevalence of tonsillar carcinoma among dogs in London and Philadelphia is relatively high1–5. Because the prevalence in a rural population was never available for comparison, it was only speculation that the rate was higher for urban than for rural dogs. Carcinoma of the tonsil was the most common oral-pharyngeal tumour in both London and Philadelphia dogs. Withers5 estimated that the prevalence of tonsillar carcinoma in London dogs was 12 per 10,000. The prevalence was 9.1 per 10,000 in the Philadelphia study2. It has been proposed that an increased prevalence of carcinoma of the tonsil may be due to the presence of carcinogenic substances in the atmosphere of industrialized cities1.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brodey, R. S., The Newer Knowledge about Dogs (Gaines Dog Research Center, New York, 1961).
Cohen, D., and Brodey, R. S., Amer. J. Vet. Res., 25, 1776 (1964).
Cotchin, E., Brit. Vet. J., 110, 218 and 274 (1954).
Cotchin, E., Vet. Rec., 63, 67 (1954).
Withers, F. W., J. Path. Bact., 49, 429 (1939).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAGLAND, W., GORHAM, J. Tonsillar Carcinoma in Rural Dogs. Nature 214, 925–926 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/214925a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/214925a0
This article is cited by
-
Zur Morphologie und H�ufigkeit prim�rer Geschw�lste der Nasenh�hlen und Nasennebenh�hlen bei Hund und Katze
Zeitschrift f�r Krebsforschung (1968)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.