Abstract
OUR search for a suitable dispersion technique to identify ultrasoft X-radiation (wavelength λ>20 Å) led us to consider the wavelength dependence of the critical angle of total reflexion. A critical angle of total reflexion exists only if the reflector is transparent to radiation. Thus, one reason for the unsatisfactory results reported by Franks and Braybrook1 could be the high absorption of the ultra-soft X-rays in the beryllium reflector used by these authors. At first glance beryllium is the best choice for a low-absorption reflector, but commercial beryllium is contaminated by heavy metals. Even a small proportion of, say, iron or nickel, combined with the beryllium oxide that always forms on the surface where total reflexion occurs, can destroy the critical angle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Franks, A., and Braybrook, R. F., Brit. J. App. Phys., 10, 190 (1959).
Dershem, E., and Schein, M., Phys. Rev., 35, 292 (1930).
Bearden, J. A., X-ray Wavelengths (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Div. of Tech. Inform., Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1964).
Compton, A. H., and Allison, S. K., X-rays in Theory and Experiment, 308, 524 (thirteenth printing, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960).
Siegbahn, M., Spektroskopie der Röntgenstrahlen, 21, second ed., (Springer, Berlin, 1931).
Henke, B. L., White, R., and Lundberg, B., J. App. Phys., 28, 98 (1957).
Lukirskii, A. P., Savinov, E. P., Ershov, O. A., Zhukova, I. I., and Fomichev, V. A., Optics and Spectroscopy, 19, 237 (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HERGLOTZ, H. Paraffin Mirrors for Ultrasoft X-rays. Nature 214, 263–265 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/214263b0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/214263b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.