Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Widely distributed Species, Land Bridges and Continental Drift

Abstract

WHEN discussing continental drift Melville wrote1: β€œIt is evident that during the Cretaceous the circum-Antarctic land bridge postulated by plant geographers from Hooker to van Steenis actually existed. The reason for such sub-Antarctic distributions as that of Juncus scheuchzerioides in Kerguelen, Tasmania, New Zealand, Fuegia and the Falklands is now clear. The separation of the New Zealand block from the Chilean fragments of South America was late enough to account for the identity of the small number of Hebe species in the latter area with their New Zealand congeners.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melville, R., Nature, 211, 116 (1966).

    ArticleΒ  ADSΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  2. Schenck, H., Deut. SΓΌd–Polar Exped., 8, 97 (1906).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  3. Chastain, A., Mem. Mus. Nat., Series B., Bot., 11 (Paris, 1958).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  4. Schimper, A. F. W., in Schenk, H., Wiss. Ergebn. Deut. Tiefsee-Exped., 2, 63 (1905).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  5. Ridley, H. N., The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World (Reeve and Co., Kent, 1930).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  6. Guppy, H. B., Observations of a Naturalist in the Pacific, 2, Plant Dispersal (Macmillan and Co., London, 1906).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  7. Skottsberg, C., Wiss. Ergebn. Schwed. SΓΌd–Polar Exped., 1901–1903, 4, 3 (1905).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  8. Cheeseman, T. F., Australasian Ant. Exped., Series C., 7 (1919).

  9. Taylor, B. W., Rep. Austral. Nat. Antarct. Res. Exped., Series B., 2 (1955).

  10. Cheeseman, T. F., in The Subantarctic Islands of New Zealand, 2, 389 (Government Printer, Wellington, 1909).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  11. Moore, L. B., in Allan, H. H., Flora of New Zealand (Government Printer, Wellington, 1961).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  12. Godley, E. J., Rev. Univ. Santiago (1963).

  13. Skottsberg, C., Bot. Ergebn. Schwed., Exped. nach Patagonien und dem Feuerlande, 1907–1909, 5 (1916).

  14. Frankel, O. H., and Hair, J. B., N.Z. J. Sci. Tech., 18, 669 (1937).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  15. Oliver, W. R. B., New Zealand Birds (A. H. and A. W. Reed, Wellington, 1955).

    Google ScholarΒ 

  16. Falla, R. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 152, 655 (1960).

    ArticleΒ  ADSΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GODLEY, E. Widely distributed Species, Land Bridges and Continental Drift. Nature 214, 74–75 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/214074a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/214074a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter β€” what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing