Abstract
IN 1948, van den Honert1 directed attention to Gradmann's idea of applying an analogue of Ohm's law to water movement in plants, and others have made the same suggestion (see Ray2 and Monteith3). Using this analogy, Gradmann concluded that the major resistance to water flow in the plant is in the gaseous phase above the transpiring surface, since almost all the potential drop occurs there. Van den Honert reconsidered this idea and concluded that the “permeability” of a free water surface appears to be 20 to 500 times smaller than protoplasmic permeability. He also concluded that regulators of water transport can be in the gaseous phase only, and if, for example, resistance to the passage of water in the roots is increased, it will have little effect on the overall rate of water transport.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Honert, T. H. van den, Disc. Far. Soc., 3, 146 (1948).
Ray, P., Plant Physiol., 35, 783 (1960).
Monteith, J. L., in Evans, L. T., Environmental Control of Plant Growth (Academic Press, New York, 1963).
Parcevaux, S. de, in L'eau et la Production Végétale (Inst. Nat. Res. Agron., Paris, 1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LEVITT, J. Resistance to Water Transport in Plants—a Misconception. Nature 212, 527 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/212527a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/212527a0
This article is cited by
-
Inhibition of water uptake by high concentrations of auxin-like substances
Biologia Plantarum (1970)
-
Resistance to Water Transport in Plants—a Misconception Misconceived
Nature (1967)
-
Resistance to Water Transport in Plants
Nature (1967)
-
Resistance to Water Transport in Plants—a Misconception?
Nature (1966)
-
Resistance to Water Transport in Plants—Whose Misconception?
Nature (1966)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.