This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism
Scientometrics Open Access 16 February 2014
-
Global Multi-Level Analysis of the ‘Scientific Food Web'
Scientific Reports Open Access 30 January 2013
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Price, D. J., Medical Opinion and Review (July 1966).
Goffman, W., and Newill, V. A., Nature, 204, 225 (1964).
Selye, H., The Mast Cells (Butterworth, 1965).
Riley, J. F., Nature, 209, 118 (1966).
Goffman, W., Nature, 210, 786 (1966).
Hurewicz, W., Lectures on Ordinary Differential Equations (M. I. T. Press, 1958).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GOFFMAN, W. Mathematical Approach to the Spread of Scientific Ideas—the History of Mast Cell Research. Nature 212, 449–452 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/212449a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/212449a0
This article is cited by
-
Phase transitions in information spreading on structured populations
Nature Physics (2020)
-
When behaviour turns contagious: the use of deterministic epidemiological models in modeling social contagion phenomena
International Journal of Dynamics and Control (2017)
-
Analyzing concept complexity, knowledge ageing and diffusion pattern of Mooc
Scientometrics (2017)
-
Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism
Scientometrics (2014)
-
Global Multi-Level Analysis of the ‘Scientific Food Web'
Scientific Reports (2013)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.