Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Plasticity of Reactions to Light in Frogs and a Possible Role for the Pineal Eye

Abstract

THE reaction of frogs to light varies considerably. Negative phototaxis as high as 80 per cent has been reported with tests in a two-choice jumping stand or Y maze1; in another Y maze the distribution between positive and negative responses was about even2. In yet other tests a strong positive reaction to light was seen3, sometimes reaching the 90 per cent level4. The importance of the exact behavioural situation used to assess the level of positive or negative responses to light can be demonstrated with a sequential choice apparatus (Fig. 1). In this, different batches of Rana temporaria showed some variability in the initial choice between a black or white surrounded water compartment. But, once in the water, there was a 5–1 probability, at the least, that at the second choice point the dark area would be selected, even if the first response had been to the lighter side. Much higher negative phototaxis scores are therefore obtained if second choice is taken into account. The first response appears to sample only part of a behavioural sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boycott, B. B., Mrosovsky, N., and Muntz, W. R. A., J. Exp. Biol., 41, 865 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muntz, W. R. A., J. Exp. Biol., 40, 371 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pearse, A. S., Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci., 45, 159 (1910).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muntz, W. R. A., J. Neurophysiol., 25, 712 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muntz, W. R. A., J. Neurophysiol., 25, 699 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mrosovsky, K., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 16, 166 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodt, E., and Heerd, E., J. Neurophysiol., 25, 405 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodt, E., and Jacobsen, M., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 752 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stebbins, R. C., and Eakin, R. M., Amer. Mus. Novitates, No. 1870 (1958).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MROSOVSKY, N., TRESS, K. Plasticity of Reactions to Light in Frogs and a Possible Role for the Pineal Eye. Nature 210, 1174–1175 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2101174a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2101174a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing