Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effective Atomic Numbers of Heterogeneous Materials

Abstract

FOR a single element, the three γ-ray processes—photoelectric, Compton and pair production, can be expressed as a function of photon energy hν and the atomic number Z of the element. At a given photon energy, the interaction is proportional to Zn where n is between 4 and 5 for the photoelectric effect, 1 for the Compton effect, and 2 for pair production1,2. For the purposes of γ-ray attenuation, a heterogeneous material, consisting of a number of elements in varying proportions, can be described as a fictitious element having an effective atomic number Zeff. In the study of the X-ray energy absorption of certain biological specimens Spiers3 used the expression Z2.94eff = ɛαiZ2.94i, where Zi is the atomic number of the ith element and αi its fractional electronic content. More recent measurements4 favour a value of 3.1 instead of 2.94 for the exponent for Zeff. Glasser5, in radiological studies, used the expression Z3eff = ɛpiZ4ipiZi, where pi is the fractional part by weight of the whole mixture occupied by the element the atomic number of which is Zi. Extending this idea of the effective atomic number of a material for specific radiation, Hine4 pointed out that there is a different effective atomic number for each absorption process in a heterogeneous material, but he could obtain expressions only for the photoelectric and pair production processes as Z3.1eff = ɛpiZ3.1i, and Zeff = ɛpiZi. It can easily be shown that pi and αi are very nearly equal6. The equations of Spiers and Hine may then be expressed as Zn−1 = ɛpiZn−1i, where n has values of 4 to 5, 1 and 2, respectively for the photoelectric, Compton, and pair production processes. Hence, an expression for the effective atomic number for the Compton effect could not be obtained. In this communication the validity of these differing expressions is examined and a single effective atomic number is suggested for a heterogeneous material.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Segre, E., Experimental Nuclear Physics, Vol. 1 (John Wiley, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein, H., The Attenuation of Gamma Rays and Neutrons in Reactor Shields (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1957).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Spiers, F. W., Brit. J. Radiology., 19, 52 (1946).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hine, G. E., Nucleonics, 10, 9 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glasser, O., Physical Foundations of Radiology (Harper, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murty, R. C., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Western Ontario (1962).

  7. Tellez-Plasencia, H., Ann. Phys. (Paris), 10, 479 (1955).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murty, R. C., Nature, 202, 584 (1964).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MURTY, R. Effective Atomic Numbers of Heterogeneous Materials. Nature 207, 398–399 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/207398a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/207398a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing